Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 27. 1997 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Special Use Permit (SUP) and variance to locate a fast food operation (Quizno's Oven Baked <br />Sandwich Shop) within the Arden Hills Texaco at 1306 County Road E (Exhibit A). The SUP <br />amendment would allow the applicant to construct a new doorway on the west side of the <br />existing building with a 4' x 11' sign above that doorway, The applicant is also requesting <br />providing patio seating on the west side of the building. This variance would allow the <br />establishment ofa principal (multi-operation) fast food use (Quizno's) within 1,320 feet of <br />another fast food use (McDonald's) at 1313 County Road E. <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald noted the Planning Commission recommends denial of the SUP amendment and <br />variance, and recommends that the landscaping previously required in the last SUP (PC #94-25) <br />be installed no later than May 31, 1997. He further stated the Planning Commission <br />recommends allowing Quizno' s to operate as an accessory use to the convenience store. The <br />Quizno's would be limited to the space (Exhibit A, page 5 of 8), signage (Exhibit A, page 7 of 8) <br />and store access (Exhibit A, page 5 of 8) which currently exists. <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald further noted the applicant has agreed to the recommendations of the Planning <br />Commission in regards to PC #94-25, and will plant the additional landscape material this spring. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski inquired regarding the size of the suggested addition. Mr. Ringwald <br />stated it was mostly modifications, those being changes in the signage, the window and door <br />being added to the west side ofthe building, and a small patio adjacent to the west side of the <br />building. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked for clarification that the Planning Commission had denied <br />this request. Mr. Ringwald stated that was the case. Mr. Ringwald further stated that, according <br />to the Planning Commission's recommendations, the applicant could use only the existing <br />signage, could make use of only the pre-existing deli area, and could not add a patio on the west <br />side of the building. Mr. Ringwald stated it was the desire of the staff to clarifY for the <br />applicants what could and could not be allowed in this matter. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone inquired ifthe repair facility was considered another separate business. <br />Mr. Ringwald stated that this was the case, and easements were in place to that effect. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone indicated he does not remember the deli being approved in the plans as <br />they were submitted in 1994. Mr. Ringwald stated he was not with the City at that time, but that <br />the Planning files and the minutes do not reflect that a deli was discussed or approved. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski inquired that if a door were to be placed on the west side of the <br />building, what would happen to the existing parking spaces, Mr. Ringwald stated the parking <br />would stay the same as it is now. He further stated the Planning Commission felt that the <br />addition of a door and a patio would make the deli closer to a principal use. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski expressed concern that the plans showed the window being placed <br />very close to the oven. She further inquired regarding the necessity of a door on the west side of <br />the building. <br />