CC 02-10-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 10 1997 4 1. 2. 3. 4. Compliance with the applicable conditions of approval of Planning Case #95-05; Total deck area for any unit shall not exceed 260 square feet in area, including stairways; Porches and/or decks shall not be constructed within easement and setback areas; Modification of the 8 foot by 12 foot "possible deck" which currently exists on Unit & such that it does not encroach into the easement by March 1, 1997; and Modification of the 14 foot by 18 foot "possible porch" on Unit #9 such that it does not encroach into the 30-foot setback requirement from the development boundary. 5. Mayor Probst inquired if decks outside of the lot are defined for each unit. Mr. Ringwald affirmed that they were defined and further stated that the decks/porches would be encroaching on the common area only, not in any easements or setbacks. Mayor Probst inquired if any landscape changes would occur with the addition of decks or porches. Mr. Ringwald stated there would be none. Mayor Probst inquired if decks or porches were allowed to overhang into easements/setbacks. Mr. Ringwald replied that would not be allowed. Councilmember Aplikowski inquired the distance from the easements to the units. Mr. Ringwald stated that there is approximately 24 feet to the unit and 10 feet between the porch and the easement. Councilmember Aplikowski reported several constituents have expressed frustration that they cannot find the relocated Ramsey County trail. Mr. Ringwald stated those matters would have to be referred to Ramsey County, and that the trail needs better definition. Mayor Probst inquired if the trail is indeed Ramsey County's. Mr. Ringwald replied affirmatively. Councilmember Hicks requested clarification on square footage issues, as the Staff recommendations are for a maximum of260 square feet, and the "possible deck" on Unit #8 is sized at 8 feet by 12 feet. Mr. Ringwald reiterated the developer is attempting to give buyers some flexibility in what they prefer to build, thus the different square foot measurements. MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to approve Planning Case #97-02, minor PUD amendment, subject to the five Staff conditions outlined in the memo. Councilmember Aplikowski commented that she appreciates the efforts ofthe residents of the area in attending meetings and gathering information. She stated that while she has no issues with the applicant's current request, the applicant must abide by Staff conditions for approval. Ms. Turgeon reiterated her request that City Council address each request for the addition of decks and porches individually. She stated there are problems with other units besides Unit #7 and Unit #9, and would like the developer to adhere to the Master Plan which was originally approved.