Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 10. 1997 14 <br />. Councilmember Hicks asked about the life expectancy of an all brick exterior versus precast over <br /> 75 years including labor, paint, and scraping, Mr. Logelin stated he does not know how often it <br /> would have to be painted, Mr, Schraad stated there would also be some maintenance over 75 <br /> years with brick and the precast surface maintenance would probably cost $2,000 to $3,000 every <br /> seven to eight years. <br /> Councilmember Hicks stated the request is to leave the total two surfaces as tipup concrete <br /> without any brick but, if the Council does not approve, they would have to go back to the <br /> membership with this new proposal. Mr. Logelin stated they do not want this to be a polarizing <br /> issue between NHLC and the City of Arden Hills and want to continue the good working <br /> relationship they have had. <br /> Mr. Logelin stated he wanted to review the chronology due to comments that NHLC was less <br /> than honest. He stated they wanted to show there was no other motive, <br /> Councilmember Hicks stated it appears that ifthis is not approved, the applicant is forced to go <br /> back to the congregation for approval. <br /> Joe Rickenbach, NHLC, explained that they will have to go back to the Council of Elders which <br /> represent the full congregation, <br />. Councilmember Hicks stated he believes this proposal is much more attractive than precast alone <br /> and he would support it. He stated they have a beautiful facility and he would not want this <br /> portion of precast concrete to be in a state of disarray over time, Councilmember Hicks stated <br /> the City would expect it to continue to represent the quality of facility they currently have. <br /> Councilmember Malone stated he believes the Church has made this a polarizing issue based on <br /> their memorandum. He explained that when he sees the comment that it will be brick and other <br /> materials to match, he believes it will be just that since there is no other precast materials on the <br /> building, <br /> Mr. Logelin stated he thought that would be the intention. <br /> Mr. Rickenbach stated he went to every meeting and every time there was the mention of brick it <br /> was also mentioned "and other matching materials." He stated if Staff had mentioned "all <br /> brick," he would have pointed out two walls were not all brick. Mr. Rickenbach noted the draft <br /> minutes of the second Planning Commission meeting talked about this and there were <br /> representatives of the Church there who said nothing, but why should they say anything since <br /> there are two precast walls there and it was to match. He stated he never saw a "red flag" or he <br /> would have said something. He stated he never heard anyone say "all brick." <br /> Councilmember Malone pointed out the overhead submitted also says "brick and other <br /> materials." He stated if this is the case, then this is not good enough either and the City will have <br />. to inspect every minor point. He stated that when others come before the Council and say they <br /> will use certain materials, they can be trusted to do just that. <br />