Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 28, 2025 3 <br />Mayor Grant reported through the joint powers agreement the City would be responsible for the <br />trunk utilities. <br />City Administrator Jagoe commented this was the case and noted the Council would be <br />discussing this matter at a future worksession meeting. <br />Councilmember Monson asked if the trunk utilities would be funded under the 429 special <br />assessment process. <br />City Administrator Jagoe stated this was the most recent discussion, but noted in the past there <br />was discussion the trunk utilities would be paid for through SAC and WAC charges. <br />Councilmember Monson indicated the City and JDA were well aware of this issue and have <br />made the County aware that this matter has to be addressed. She agreed the City was not <br />interested in funding these utilities without having some form of repayment. She reiterated that <br />this project has a developer named within the preliminary development agreement and the JDA <br />was working with them in order to achieve substantial progress. <br />Mayor Grant explained the JDA has an Advisory Committee that Councilmember Monson sits <br />on. He reported he was not included in these meetings, but noted he would continue to watch out <br />for the City and would voice his concerns. <br />Councilmember Monson commented she did not intend to offend the Mayor. She stated she <br />would continue to ask questions and noted she looked forward to addressing this matter at a future <br />worksession meeting. <br />Mayor Grant indicated he was not offended, but stated he was doing his job representing the <br />City. He stated he would continue to ask questions given the fact there were some unknowns, and <br />these unknowns were substantial. He reported he asked about the spine road with the knowledge <br />that the County funded the entire surface and utilities for the roadway serving Outlot A. He <br />commented further on how June 30 was rapidly approaching and would be the end of the <br />preliminary development agreement. <br />Councilmember Monson reiterated that the JDA was very aware of the June 30 deadline. <br />Councilmember Holden stated as a City, the utility work that has been done in the past was done <br />for redundancy purposes and the City was to be reimbursed for this work. She indicated this work <br />needs to be paid for by TCAAP as well. <br />Mayor Grant commented two and a half years have gone by and money has been spent, the <br />project has changed, density has changed, affordability has changed, acreage has changed, and <br />certain climate action plans have been instituted. He looked forward to hearing more on this <br />project. He asked if there was a general agreed upon definition of what might trigger an extension. <br />Councilmember Monson stated there has been no discussion as to what this would look like. She <br />reported she did not believe the development agreement had to be completed by June 30, but if <br />there was light at the end of the tunnel she could be open to an extension. She indicated there has <br />been no discussion as to what substantial progress looks like. <br />