CC 03-30-1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MARCH 30. 1998 10 . Mayor Probst declared a recess at 9:08 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:17 p.m. B. Resolution #98-34, Adopting Final Bituminous Overlay, Assessment Roll, 5 year Amortization Mayor Probst explained the Council is asked to adopt Resolution #98-34 which would adopt the final bituminous overlay assessment roll with a five-year amortization and set the assessment for those property owners who are to be assessed over a five-year period for overlay work as part of the 1998 Street Improvement Proj ect. Mr. Post suggested the appeals be tabulated and placed into the record. Councilmember Malone advised there are 12 written appeals, virtually all of them protesting to the cost. He entered the following nine appeals into the record as follows: Res. No. Parcel No. Address Name F ootag-e Assessment 98-35 14 1880 Edgewater Thunborg 75.00 $2,998.50 98-35 16 1887 Edgewater Hansen 75.00 $2,998.50 98-35 17 1895 Edgewater Nielsen 75.00 $2,998.50 98-35 21 1905 Edgewater Goetz 75.00 $2,998.50 98-35 34 1955 Edgewater Boehlke 75.00 $2,998.50 . 98-35 27 1925 Edgewater Elhardt 75.00 $2,998.50 98-35 35 1960 Edgewater Evans 75.00 $2,998.50 98-35 36 1961 Edgewater Andrews 75.00 $3,663.75 98-35 38 1967 Edgewater Luehrs 75.00 $2,998.50 MOTION: Councilmember Malone moved and Councilmember Hicks seconded a motion to reject all of the above appeals since the Council believes the cost is consistent with the benefit and all protested in terms of the prior assessment amount noticed to them which has already been substantially reduced and the Council has determined to fund stormwater system costs from the SWM Fund. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). Councilmember Malone reviewed the appeal of Susan Keim for 2056 Stowe Avenue based on the assessment being excessive and indicating agreement to pay $37 per foot as a base cost minus curb, gutter, the remaining storm water management, and indicating disagreement with being charged a higher rate due to the City's and New Brighton's decision to delay the project. MOTION: . MOTION: Councilmember Malonc moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a motion to reject the appeal by Susan Keim, 2056 Stowe Avenue, since the Council believes the cost is consist with the benefit and the assessment was protested in terms of tbe prior assessment amount noticed which has already been substantially rcduced and the Council has determined to fund stormwater system costs from the SWM Fund. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). Councilmember Malone moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a motion to reject appeal to overlay the road by Michael and Jean Hill, 3280 Lake Johanna Boulevard, since Sandeen Road does not abut their driveway because it is