My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 04-27-1998
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CC 04-27-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:53 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 3:22:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - APRIL 27.1998 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald stated that the applicant has provided a revised survey which shows the provision <br />of a 5 foot setback, a draft cross vehicular easement whose form has been reviewed and approved <br />by the City Attorney, a draft drainage and utility easement whose form has been reviewed and <br />approved by the City Attorney. The Park and Recreation Director has reviewed the subject <br />property and determined that it had previously paid its park dedication fee, therefore none is <br />required. <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald stated that approval of the sign variance was similar to the City Council's approval <br />of a variance for Control DataJDynamark in the past. Mr. Ringwald stated that the north edge of <br />the parcel does not currently have development, but signage and vehicular access should be put <br />in place anyway. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated he has no particular negative concerns except that this is creating <br />a lot of record without any public street access. He clarified that if future development were to <br />transpire on the empty parcel, the City of Arden Hills would not be responsible for providing any <br />street access. He emphasized that the property owner is fully aware of this situation and that <br />requesting this lot split provides access only through cross vehicular access easements. <br />Councilmember Malone stated he would not want any future Council to be held to providing <br />access. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks asked about the height of the pylon sign. Mr. Ringwald responded that <br />. the pylon sign is specified as less than 16 feet and provides identification from 1-694. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks inquired if there were any other signs in front ofthe Emerald Inn. Mr. <br />Ringwald responded that there was a sign in front ofthe entry way. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst clarified that if a future property that develops on the rear side of the parcel <br />requests a front sign, the City Council would deny such a request. By approving the current <br />request for a shared pylon sign, the property owners are foregoing the opportunity to add another <br />sign to the 1-694 frontage in the future. <br /> <br />COlmcilmember Aplikowski inquired if there is a current sign on top of the Emerald Inn. <br /> <br />Thomas Torgerson, Emerald Inn, stated there are three signs altogether. There is one sign on <br />the canopy, another sign on the frontage road, and the third is a pylon sign. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks inquired if the park dedication fees were paid on the whole property. Mr. <br />Ringwald responded that the fees were paid when the property was originally developed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski requested that the new owner of the Emerald Inn clean up the <br />parking lot on the property. Mr. Torgerson stated Emerald Inn would be renovated and become <br />part of the Super 8 Hotel franchise this fall. As of May I, the new owner would take over the <br />property and start renovation on the property. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.