Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 8, 1998 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />border of the TCAAP property along Highway 96) will become more important. He stated that <br />he hopes the County will work with the City to assure this is part of the project and part of the <br />funding consideration. <br /> <br />Mr. Tolaas stated they will very aggressively pursue the type of financial support available <br />through Mn/DOT and try to make a good case to support it. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated it has been his impression that the decision about what happens at I-35W is <br />in a holding pattern pending resolution of the Highways 10/96 interchange. He asked if closure <br />of this intersection will move the 1-35W upgrade along. Mr. Tolaas agreed it will move the 1- <br />35W intersection up in Mn/DOT's schedule and funding support. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst noted the ISTEA revision resulted in a higher funding level and asked if this will <br />help this project. Mr. Tolaas stated it makes more funding available and he hopes they will be <br />able to tap into that greater availability. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated she supports the Highway IO west access and believes it is <br />important for North Heights Lutheran Church and also for other traffic in the area. She asked if <br />the trail will remain on the south side and cross the bridge. Mr, Tolaas stated this is correct. He <br />explained that their park staff has reviewed ail options and believe if there is no path on the south <br />side it will result in pedestrians in the roadbed which presents a greater problem. He stated it is <br />also integral to connect to the Long Lake Park area. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst agreed with the need to provide a safe crossing if the bridge is constructed. He <br />noted with the exception of one ramp, it provides the grade separation desired for pedestrians and <br />bicycles and the City will lobby the County and State to make the connection from the south <br />rather than from the bridge. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks stated the Council is considering concept approval to the plan tonight and <br />not considering the various costs of all parties involved at this point. Mayor Probst stated this is <br />also his interpretation; to endorsc a grade separation subject to resolving these conditions as <br />outlined. The cost participation is covered on the Highway 10 bridge as well. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks stated as the cost issues are discussed the Council may decide to abort <br />some issues based on whether the City can afford it, such as the eastbound turn lane (which costs <br />$250,000) if North Heights Lutheran Church determines to not become a financial partner. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated another issue is the signals and whether Mn/DOT can be convinced there is <br />enough traffic to warrant their participation in tbe cost. He asked how it will be determined if <br />there is enough traffic to warrant the ofl" ramps and participation in those costs. <br /> <br />Mr. Tolaas explained that they started with a conservative cost approach and with the <br />understanding these ramps are a temporary issue. However, if a good case can be made that <br />these access points are vital to community traffic, they will probably consider it. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated Mn/DOT does need the City's approval for the change in this intersection, <br />Mr. Tolaas stated from a practical and political standpoint it is essential. <br />