My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
04-28-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2025 8:56:39 AM
Creation date
5/13/2025 8:56:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 28, 2025 10 <br /> fees to be paid as part of the development project, totaling $1,223,500, be allocated toward the <br /> additional costs of the trail. The narrative notes that the trail could be constructed by Trident's <br /> contractor or by the City. <br /> City Administrator Jagoe commented on the request before the Council is a revision to <br /> Condition 28 to read: "The Applicant shall install at their expense a trail along Snelling Avenue <br /> and within Snelling Avenue right-of-way, adjacent to the Subject Property, which shall be <br /> approximately 1,373 feet in length to serve as a connection to Royal Hills Park and consistent <br /> with City Code requirements. The final location and specifications of the trail connections shall <br /> be approved by the PW Director/City Engineer and Community Development Director. The costs <br /> in excess of$90,000 incurred to the Applicant for the installation of the approximately 1,373 feet <br /> will be deducted from the Applicant's park development fee." <br /> Mayor Grant stated the total length of the trail was 1,373 feet. <br /> City Administrator Jagoe explained this was only the length of the trail abutting the North <br /> Heights property. She estimated the length of the trail adjacent to the property to the north of the <br /> subject property to be 396 feet. <br /> Councilmember Weber asked whether the original proposal was not intended for a grade <br /> separated trail. <br /> City Administrator Jagoe reported this was correct, noting after the developer looked at the <br /> area, an initial trail plan was created to start a dialogue with the Public Works Director. She <br /> indicated it was at this time, the Public Works Director noted the proposed trail would not meet <br /> MSA standards because the trail would have to be grade separated. <br /> Councilmember Holden explained the City was supposed to be getting something in return for <br /> the flexibility offered for this project and this was supposed to be the trail. She reported the costs <br /> were what staff had estimated and the developer had agreed to this. However, she understood <br /> there were things the Council did not understand at that time. She stated she appreciated the <br /> proposal and appreciated the fact there would be a trail up to the playground. She supported the <br /> trail moving forward as proposed by staff. <br /> Councilmember Weber clarified the applicant would only be paying $90,000 towards the trail <br /> and the City would be paying the remainder. He indicated the developer had readily agreed to put <br /> in this trail in order to get the additional density, but then changed their minds, once the costs <br /> came in for the actual trail. He did not believe the trail costs were hidden and commented on how <br /> the additional density that was approved would be worth more than $1.3 million for the <br /> developer. He was of the opinion the developer received a good deal. He supported the developer <br /> paying for all trail costs. <br /> Mayor Grant commented if his math was correct, the developer would be paying $1.23 million <br /> and the City would be paying $253,000. He noted this leaves about $900,000 that the developer <br /> will have to bring forward. He indicated these funds could be used for this project or the Old <br /> Highway 10 Trail. He stated that particular trail was an important connection for the City because <br /> it goes from Roseville to Highway 96. He explained the City has Safe Routes to School dollars <br /> from the Met Council and if these funds were applied to this project, the City's portion would be <br /> close to fully funded. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.