My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
04-28-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2025 8:56:39 AM
Creation date
5/13/2025 8:56:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 28, 2025 3 <br /> Mayor Grant reported through the joint powers agreement the City would be responsible for the <br /> trunk utilities. <br /> City Administrator Jagoe commented this was the case and noted the Council would be <br /> discussing this matter at a future worksession meeting. <br /> Councilmember Monson asked if the trunk utilities would be funded under the 429 special <br /> assessment process. <br /> City Administrator Jagoe stated this was the most recent discussion, but noted in the past there <br /> was discussion the trunk utilities would be paid for through SAC and WAC charges. <br /> Councilmember Monson indicated the City and JDA were well aware of this issue and have <br /> made the County aware that this matter has to be addressed. She agreed the City was not <br /> interested in funding these utilities without having some form of repayment. She reiterated that <br /> this project has a developer named within the preliminary development agreement and the JDA <br /> was working with them in order to achieve substantial progress. <br /> Mayor Grant explained the JDA has an Advisory Committee that Councilmember Monson sits <br /> on. He reported he was intentionally excluded from these meetings but noted he would continue <br /> to watch out for the City and would voice his concerns. <br /> Councilmember Monson commented she did not intend to offend the Mayor. She stated she <br /> would continue to ask questions and noted she looked forward to addressing this matter at a future <br /> worksession meeting. <br /> Mayor Grant indicated he was not offended, but stated he was doing his job representing the <br /> City. He stated he would continue to ask questions given the fact there were some unknowns, and <br /> these unknowns were substantial. He reported he asked about the spine road with the knowledge <br /> that the County funded the entire surface and utilities for the roadway serving Outlot A. He <br /> commented further on how June 30 was rapidly approaching and would be the end of the <br /> preliminary development agreement. <br /> Councilmember Monson reiterated that the JDA was very aware of the June 30 deadline. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated as a City, the utility work that has been done in the past was done <br /> for redundancy purposes and the City was to be reimbursed for this work. She indicated this work <br /> needs to be paid for by TCAAP as well. <br /> Mayor Grant commented two and a half years have gone by and money has been spent, the <br /> project has changed, density has changed, affordability has changed, acreage has changed, and <br /> certain climate action plans have been instituted. He looked forward to hearing more on this <br /> project. He asked if there was a general agreed upon definition of what might trigger an extension. <br /> Councilmember Monson stated there has been no discussion as to what this would look like. She <br /> reported she did not believe the development agreement had to be completed by June 30, but if <br /> there was light at the end of the tunnel she could be open to an extension. She indicated there has <br /> been no discussion as to what substantial progress looks like. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.