My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
04-28-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2025 8:56:39 AM
Creation date
5/13/2025 8:56:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 28, 2025 5 <br /> 9. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS <br /> None. <br /> 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> A. Planning Case 25-001 —Variance and Conditional Use Permit for 1126 Benton <br /> Way <br /> City Administrator Jagoe stated 1126 Benton Way ("Subject Property ) is zoned R-3, <br /> Townhouse and Low-density Multiple Dwelling District, and is designated for Low Density <br /> Residential Uses in the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The Subject Property is the site of a <br /> single-family dwelling owned by the Applicant. All adjacent properties to the north, east, and <br /> south are also zoned R-3, Townhouse and Low-density Multiple Dwelling District, and <br /> designated for Low Density Residential Uses in the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The <br /> parcel to the west is zoned B-2, General Business District, and designated for Commercial Uses in <br /> the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan. <br /> City Administrator Jagoe explained in the 1970s, the Subject Property was established as part of <br /> the Hunters Park neighborhood and homeowners associations through a Planned Unit <br /> Development (PUD). A PUD can permit a greater amount of flexibility for developments from <br /> the underlying zoning regulations. The Hunters Park PUD used the flexibility permitted in the <br /> PUD process, and the neighborhood was designed with varying lot sizes, structure setbacks, and <br /> lot coverages. A number of the lots were permitted to have structures that did not meet the <br /> underlying zoning requirements, which is a legitimate use of the PUD process. Because the lot <br /> sizes and building locations were approved as part of the PUD process, they are not considered <br /> nonconforming even if they do not meet the underlying R- 3 zoning requirements. In 1985, the <br /> City Council approved a process evaluating future changes to structures in Hunters Park: <br /> • If additions or alterations to the homes do not require setback or coverage variances from <br /> the R-3 Zone, only a building permit issued administratively by the City shall be required. <br /> This removed the need for a PUD amendment with every change. <br /> • If additions or alterations to cluster homes do require additional variances of any kind <br /> from the R-3 Zone, the standard variance procedure set by the City shall apply. <br /> • If both cases, the Architectural and Environmental Committee of the Hunters Park <br /> Homeowners Association shall review and approve the proposed addition or alteration <br /> before submitting the same to the City. It shall assist individual homeowners in <br /> determining if a variance is required for proposed alterations. <br /> City Administrator Jagoe commented according to the planning case files, the Hunters Park <br /> homeowner association approved this process along with the City. Since many of the lots and <br /> structures are "nonconforming" under the R-3 regulations, a variance is almost always required. <br /> There have been at least five variances approved for additions in the Hunters Park neighborhood; <br /> however, past variance approvals are not a basis for current variance reviews. In 2009, a previous <br /> owner of the Subject Property requested three variances to construct a 585 square foot addition to <br /> the dwelling. The proposed addition encroached eight (8) feet into the required 30 foot rear yard <br /> setback, encroached four (4) feet into the required 40 foot front yard setback, and increased the <br /> structure coverage on the lot from 19.4 percent to 26 percent. The variance was approved by the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.