My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 08-10-1998
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CC 08-10-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:54 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 3:22:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - AUGUST 10, 1998 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Council member Larson inquired regarding the mobilization funds which were withheld, Mr. <br />Brown explained that the contractor was to be paid $30,000 for mobilization, has received only <br />about $5,000. Typically, payment of the mobilization money is part of Pay Estimate #1 but the <br />City withheld that. In addition, the original completion date is coming up shortly. Mr. Brown <br />explained that so far with interim completion dates, the contractor was late by ten or more days <br />on all segments except for Edgewater Avenue. The final completion date is a week from this <br />Friday. The City could get liquidated damages of $500 per day ifthe project is not completed by <br />this date. However, a damage claim would require legal action. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked if there was some other way to capture the contractor's attention in <br />paying this request, and if it is possible to further withhold payment. Mr. Brown said this could <br />be done, but the City only paid about $5,000 of the $30,000 mobilization which would normally <br />have been 100% paid with Pay Estimate #1. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger advised that the Council has, in the past, withheld payment above and beyond the <br />typical retainage. However, the City Attorney has expressed concern about the legal ability to do <br />that for an extended period of time and indicated the City cannot arbitrarily withhold funds. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski suggested the Councilmembers remember this when considering the <br />next contract award. She stated Mr. Schifsky should be informed ofthe Council's concern either <br />by a letter or verbal comment. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a <br />motion to approve Pay Estimate #2 to T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. for 1998 Street <br />Improvements in the amount of $212,464.96 subject to a 5% retainage. The <br />motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger advised the Council that Mr. Post and Mr. Stafford visited the maintenance facility <br />that the City of Hutchinson shares with the State and County, This was a fact finding effort <br />related to the financing agreements and operations. He advised that some good information was <br />received which will be helpful for the Finance Committee. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger said the Planning Commission approved the site plan and Special Use Permit for <br />the proposed City Hall. The Commission's discussion centered on the size of the facility and <br />whether it was large enough for future expansion and the size and use for the community room. <br />Other key areas with the entry area into the facility, the roof slope down to the entrance, and <br />concern about ice and snow accumulation. The architects will be looking at these concerns and <br />staff will meet with them next week. A further report will be made at the August 31, 1998, <br />Council meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger raised the issue of the need for a larger capacity copy machine for the <br />administrative offices since current machines are not adequate for the number of copies being <br />made and there have been many breakdowns. Mr. Fritsinger reported on the number of machines <br />which have been viewed and the proposal from Xerox for a copier that is quicker and offers more <br />time-saving advanced features. However, $10,000 had been budgeted for a new copier and the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.