Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - DECEMBER 14,1998 5 <br /> from the building, The Building Inspector has been in discussion with the contractor about that <br />. issue and it appears they will be relocated near the sidewalk. <br /> Ms, Randall advised that Staff recommended approval of Planning Case #98-32, Site Plan, <br /> subject to the provision of sediment and erosion control measures adjacent to the affected area <br /> for development, the tire hydrant be relocated to a location along the existing sidewalk per <br /> approval by Staff, and that the watermain be relocated at least 10 feet from the proposed and <br /> existing building per approval by Staff. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended <br /> approval of Planning Case #98-32, Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., 4100 Hamline Avenue, Site Plan, <br /> subject to the recommendations indicated by Staff. <br /> Councilmember Malone noted that the neighbor expressed concern with parking since it has been <br /> overflowing into the residential area during special events. <br /> Dave Reimer, Guidant, stated that he spoke with that resident and resolved his concerns. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Malone moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br /> motion to approve Planning Case #98-32, Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., 4100 <br /> Hamline A venue, Site Plan, subject to the provision of sediment and erosion <br /> control measures adjacent to the affected area for development, the fire hydrant <br /> being relocated along the existing sidewalk per approval by Staff, and the <br /> watermain be relocated at least ten feet from the proposed and existing building <br />. per approval by StatT The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> 3. Planning Case #98-31, City of Arden Hills, Zoning Code Amendment <br /> Ms. Randall explained that the City of Arden Hills requested approval of an amendment to the <br /> Zoning Ordinance, The amendment would clarify that substandard sized lots which existed prior <br /> to the adoption of the Gateway Business District (GBD) and the ordinance being created. She <br /> reviewed the properties involved which were in existence prior to the adoption of Ordinance <br /> #291. Ms. Randall noted that it also includes a provision to address lots made substandard by a <br /> governmental taking so they are exempt from the minimum size requirement of that district. <br /> Ms. Randall explained that the Gateway Business District required that single parcels have at <br /> least ten acres to be considered developable, Several parcels exist which existed prior to the <br /> development of this district that have less than the required ten acres. The proposed Code <br /> change would allow these properties to be considered developable. The Code change would also <br /> allow parcels that were reduced below the minimum size as a result of a governmental taking to <br /> be considered developable. The Code change would not allow a parcel to be subdivided below <br /> the minimum size requirement and be considered developable. <br /> Ms. Randall reviewed the suggested wording changes and advised that Staff was recommending <br /> approval of Planning Case #98-31, Zoning Code amendment. The Planning Commission <br />. unanimously recommended approval of Planning Case #98-31, City of Arden I-Iills, Zoning Code <br /> amendment based on the modified language to Section V, K, 5, a, (5), (b) to read "Are <br /> substandard in size as a result of the acquisition or condemnation by a governmental entity for <br /> ---- <br />