CC 09-12-1977 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M1nutes of Regular Council Meeting Page fl ve September 12, 1977 it was noted that Council approves the varianc~for Lot I, which ,Is substandard In depth and area, and It Is understood that any required sanitary sewer Hlfts are to be owned by the property owners, not the City. Case No. 77-27. BulldlnQ HelQht Variance - Mutual Service Office BulldlnQ Planner Mi! lar reported that the Planning Commission determined that the best way to consider a height variance for the proposed Mutual Service building is to tie It to an elevation because of the undulating land: difficult to determine height from grade for the various building elevations. ' . Miller noted that the Planning Commission considered the impact of the building on the adjacent developments and recommends Council approval of a building height variance for the Mutual Service Office Bul idlng; elevation not to exceed 963' at top of roof deck with a maximum 30" parapet above the roof deck, and a maximum elevation of 973' at top of elevator penthouse; penthouse not to exceed 20% of main ,area of roof. ' Tom Lynch (Wlnsor/Faricy Architects) described the proposed building elevations - at main entrance (north side) at 924'; roof deck at 963': top of penthouse at 973'. South elevation cafeteria entrance at 898' elevation. in discussion, Miller noted that variances can be granted beCause of hardship arising because of speCial conditions applying to the structure or land in question. It was noted that Ord. 99 also permits bulldlngsthat exceed the height limits Imposed by provisions of the ordinance, by Special Use Permit (Sec IV, Q. Floor Area Ratiosl. Lynch noted that the building covers about 'i acres of the 54 total acres (40 acres 'f park and residential are excluded): proposed building wi I I be located approximately 500' from resl,den- tlal to the west, 600' from residential to the east and 900' from residential to the south. After discussion, Hanson moved, seconded by Woodburn, that Council approve building height variances as recommended by the Planning Commission (Minutes of September 6, 1977), subject to the additional contingencies that building entrance, at cafeteria, to be at a maximum 895' elevation and that pen+house not exceed 12% of main area of roof (Instead of 20% as recommended by the Planning Commis- sion). Refer to eievatlons on section drawings dated 9/12/77. Motion carried unanimously. Case No. 77-43. Variance from Ordinance 147 - Detached Garage, Jerry Beltz CArden Manor) Planner Miller referred Council to his report of 8/31/77 and to the Planning Comm1sslon recommendations (Minutes of Sept. 6th); suggested that anamehdment to the Spacial Use Permit for Arden Manor Is probably necessary, rather than a variance from Ordinance No. 147. . After discussion, Woodburn moved. seconded by Hanson, that Council deny the request for a varIance for a detached garage on the basis that garages are not permitted by the Special Uso Permit granted for Arden Manor, and would create a more crowded situation than is envisioned for the area. Motion carried unanimously. REPORT OF VILLAGE BUILDING INSPECTOR LARRY SQUIRES Recommendation re SIQn Permits and Licenses for Governmental AQencles~ Public Schools and Churches Squires referred Council ~to his memo of August 17th and noted that It has been Village policy to not require licenses for the County beach signs (Tony Schmidt Park), publIc schools, and churches. After discussion, Crichton moved seconded by Hanson, that Council authorize waiver of fees for governmental agencies, provIded Attorney Lynden determines It Is permissible to do so. Motion carried unani- mOlJsly. -5-