My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-25-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
05-28-25-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2025 4:50:01 PM
Creation date
5/22/2025 3:08:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—MAY 28, 2025 3 <br /> Councilmember Holden commented she did not support having townhouses or rowhouses in R- <br /> 1 either. She recommended that Permitted with Standards be added to R-1 townhouses and <br /> cottage courtyard. <br /> City Administrator Jagoe explained staff could come back with further information on the how <br /> cottage courtyard,rowhouses, twinhomes and townhouses would be defined within City Code. <br /> Councilmember Holden suggested the City owned property along County Road 96 be zoned <br /> Civic instead of Neighborhood Business, in the event the City needs to expand the Public Works <br /> Facility. <br /> Mayor Grant stated he supported this suggestion. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau indicated she did not support this recommendation. She explained <br /> this property could have a higher use than Civic. <br /> Councilmember Holden reported land was limited and land around TCAAP was even more <br /> limited. <br /> Councilmember Monson stated she understood Shoreview also needed to expand their Public <br /> Works Facility and there might be opportunities to work with them. She asked how many acres <br /> the property was along County Road 96. <br /> City Administrator Jagoe indicated the property was just under seven acres. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau stated she did not support using this property as Civic and explained <br /> it was her understanding the neighbors were concerned about how this site would develop and <br /> there was concern about change in general in that space. She said it sounded like the Planning <br /> Commission at that time, that all of the Planning Commissioners had approved that but when it <br /> went to the Council it was denied. She explained this was the recollection from the previous chair <br /> of the Planning Commission at that time. <br /> A short discussion ensued regarding the old planning case regarding development of this site on <br /> Count Road 96 and that the applicant had pulled out of the project. <br /> Councilmember Monson recommended this property be focused on further at the July work <br /> session. <br /> Further discussion ensued regarding group housing options. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked how a boarding house was defined. She understood there were <br /> individuals interested in building a boardinghouse in the community. <br /> City Administrator Jagoe reviewed the definition noting a boarding house could only <br /> accommodate three to five people. <br /> Councilmember Monson stated she would prefer to keep residence halls as student only and <br /> within an institution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.