My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 06-27-1977
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
CC 06-27-1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:56 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 3:46:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Minutes of Regular Council Meeting <br />Page th ree <br /> <br />Bill Newham, 1786 Glenvlew Avenue - said that a dog catcher during <br />the day Is almost useless; needed during the evening hours and at <br />night when the dogs are let out and are running; objected to the <br />proposed ordinance which would not permit him to run his dog In <br />the open areas of the vi Ilage; objects to the proposed ordinance; <br />ordinance should also include cats, which can be as much of a <br />nuisance as dogs, <br /> <br />June 27, 1977 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Crichton moved that the motion be amended to substitute Section 12 of <br />existing ordinance No. 17, In place of Section 7, with appropriate <br />reference changes. Motl.on was seconded by Hanson. Amendment to the <br />motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />In further discussion re cost of enforcement, J. Ross commented that the <br />community officer, as proposed by Woodburn, would be an excel lent way <br />to enforce the ordinance; likes a life-time license, but an annual <br />license probably would help to cover the cost of enforcement; there wll I <br />be some revenue from Section 18, If the City pervalls; could Issue <br />tickets for unlicensed dogs. <br /> <br />Dianne McAllister. 1200 Ingerson Road - said she doesn't mind an <br />annual license fee; would like to get her dog back, If It should <br />get away; feels most dog owners can afford the license fee. <br /> <br />Woodburn moved that the ordinance be amended as follows: <br /> <br />I. Title Changed to add "Amending Ordlnence 164". <br />2. Section I. Definitions <br />(b) Kennel. "... for pleasure or profit three (3) or lllOre <br />dogs, older than six (6) months, shall be deemed .. .." <br />3. Section 2. Transition; Two-Year License Required; Fee. <br />Change wording In paragraph 2 from "permanent" to "for two <br />(2) years" and change fee from "Five Dollars ($5.00)" to <br />"Ten Dollars ($10.00).; delete "during Its life" (5th line, <br />Section 2) <br />4. Section 12. Howling and Barking. . <br />Add to last sentence "and provided complaint has not been <br />withdrawn by either party". <br />5. Section 15. Muzzling Proclamation, <br />Change "hydrophobia" to "rabies". <br />6. Section 17. <br />Revise according to Attorney's letter of 6/24/77. <br /> <br />Motion was seconded by Wingert, and motion as amended, carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />Council referred the Ordinance, as adopted, to the Public Safety Committee <br />and Acting Police Chief for recommendations re enforcement. <br /> <br />Case No. 77-14. Special Use Permit for Town Crier Pancake House <br />Restaurant. <br />Lynden referred Council to a draft of the Special Use Permit - Case <br />No. 77-14. <br /> <br />. In discussion the following changes were made: <br /> <br />paragraph 3 - change "Arden Hills" to "Rosevl I Ie", Minnesota. <br />condition 6 - Contribution of "a sum, as approved by the Council" <br />Instead of a "$ " <br /> <br />Wingert moved, seconded by Hanson, that the Counci I approve the Special <br />Use Permit - Case No. 77-14, as amended. Motion carried unanimoUSly. <br /> <br />Case No. 77-21. Amended SpeCial Use Permit for Addition to Minnesota <br />Baptist Conferenc$ Sui Idlng. <br />Lynden referred Council to draft of Special Use Permit - Case No. 77-21, <br />noting that It should read Amended Special Use Permit - Case No. 77-21. <br /> <br />Wingert moved, seconded by Hanson, that Council approve the Amended <br />Special Use Permit - Case No. 77-21. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.