CC 06-13-1977 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of Regular Council Meeting Page th ree June 13, 1977 the view. Mulcahy said he feels he can reorient the garage to reduce the street-side variance to 10' to 12' (request Is for 14'); asked Councl I to consider a 30'/30' setback (30' from street and lake property lines). . After discussion, Hanson moved, seconded by Crepeau, that Council approve a 9' maximum setback variance on the Lake Johanna Blvd. side of the lot (31' from property line), and a 15' maximum setback variance on the lake side of the lot (25' from the hIgh water mark); subject to consolidation of the two lots Into one building lot; no side yard variances are requested. Motion carried (Crepeau, Hanson, Crichton voting In favor of the motion; Woodburn, Wingert voting In opposition). Case No. 77-24, Variance - 1358 Elde Circle, Daniel Lipinski Miller referred Council to his report of 6/1/77, and attached alternate proposals. Reported that the Board of Appeals has recommended denial of the front setback variance; the Planning Commission has recommended approval. Mi lIer noted that this Odd-shaped lot comprises considerable area for building a house; not concerned that provisions of solar collectors necessarily dictates the shape and size of the balance of the house, or that It must be aligned. Lipinski said that house can be reoriented up to 120, but It would stili require a front variance of 15' (25' from cul-de-sac portion of the street), Mrs. Lipinski said the lot would provide for a long, narrow house, possibly without a variance, but they don't want that (have a mobile home now). Lipinski noted that all the Elde Circle residents have signed a statement that they have no objections to the proposed siting of the house; home will be In alignment with other homes on the street. After discussion, Wingert moved, seconded by Hanson, that Council approve the l5' front setback variance for the house at 1358 Elde Circle, on the basis that It maintains the character of the neighbor- hood as well as the alignment of homes on the street. Motion carried (Wingert, Hanson, Crichton, Crepeau voting In favor of the motion; Woodburn voting In opposition). Miller noted that the preceding variance points out the need for a closer and more stringent look at lot shapes and sizes at the platting stage. Case No. 77-14, Special Use Permit for a Town Crier Pancake House Restaurant Miller referred Counci I to his report of 6/2/77, to the Engl neers letter of 6/6/77, to the site plan and to the contingencies upon which the Planning Commission bases Its recommendation for approval of the Issuance of a Special Use Permit for the construction and operation of a restaurant at the northwest corner of Lexington Avenue and Red Fox Road. . Miller reviewed the six (6) contingencies recommended by the Planning Commission (Minutes dated 6/7/77), noted that he is not certain that the westerly driveway needs to be an "Exit" only; driveway can accommodate two-way traffic. Miller noted that a recorded lot spl It is necessary In order to separate the restaurant use (permitted by Special Use Permit) from the balance of the site, whiCh Is not included under the Special Use Permit. Miller noted that a lighting and slgnage plan should be submitted. After discussion, Crichton moved, seconded by Woodburn, that Councl I approve the Issuance of a Special Use Permit for the construction and operation of a Town Crier Pancake House restaurant as per plan dated received 6/7/77, and approval of the lot split as dimensioned, subject to the 6 points outlined In the Planning Commission Minutes of 6/7/77. -3-