CC 06-13-1977 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of Regular Counci I Meeting Page five June 13, 1977 easement area across the south portlon of the Buesing property which the City could obtain for $12,000. Crichton noted that the minor 3-parcel subdivision will be subject to park dedication of 10% of the value of the undeveloped land. After discussion, Wingert moved that the Council approve the 3- parcel minor subdivision of the Buesing 8.5 acre property as shown on the surveys presented with Case No. 77-22, noting parcel #3 Is to be consolidated with property to the north. Motion was seconded by Crichton. . After further discussion re access width and exact location desired, Wingert wlthdre'~ his motion and Crichton concurred. Council referred the matter to the Parks Committee for Its recommendations to the Council for consideration at Its June 27th meeting. Mr. William Day, purchaser of parcel 2, suggested that Council make Its approval contingent upon the Parks Committee resolving the park dedication negotiations, would prefer not having to walt another month on his minor subdivision and Special Use Permit application for a double bungalow. Crichton moved, seconded by Hanson, that Councl I approve the 3-way subdivision and a fourth parcel for a trail, subject to resolution of the park dedication and contingent upon a re-draft of the R.L.S. in further discussion, It was determined that some proposal for park dedication should be submitted to the Parks Committee on the split of the Buesing property, Including an access to the trail from Hamllne, prior to approval of the 3-parcel subdivision; therefore, . ...cr I chto~.w I !h drew hi s mot I Oil <~;d~.!'$!' s_on.l( l.t~,drew his secon It. 1oOI ~J.-- ." .~~ftA.)~~ 7/~.~ 't7..c,(4to.""'~zj,~~' Mr. Rexelsen was requested to submit a proposal to fhe Parks Committee on Tuesday, June 15th. Council deferred Its action until the June 27th meeting. Miller referred Council to his report re Case No. 77-23 dated 6/1/77 and noted that a double bungalow on the center lot of the 3 lot minor subdivision of parcel 2 Is proposed, which Is a permitted use in an R-I zone with a Special Use Permit. Miller said that In his analysis, the two-family usage of this lot would not be In compatible with surrounding development; It represents an appropriate development for the relatively large lot, and Is a reasonable progression from slngle-fami Iy to limited business area. . Wingert noted that public sentiment at the Public Hearing was to oppose a double bungalow; Planning Commission recommended approval of the double bungalow. Mr. Day showed a sketch of the proposed tWO-family house which he said meets al I ordinance requirements; proposes two driveweys which will Join with only one curb cut onto Hamllne Avenue. ~ After dlscusslon,^Crlchton and Hanson Indicated that If Councl I approves the previous minor subdivision of the Buesing property, and the minor subdivision of parcel 2 Into three lots, they would approve the Special Use Permit for the double bungalow on the center lot, as proposed. Wingert Indicated he Is In favor of the 3-lot subdivision of parcel 2, but not the concept of the double bun ga I ow . Diane McAllister noted that the residents at the Public Hearing were not necessarily opposed to this particular two-family house; do not want a row of double bungalows. Council deferred Its action pending the Parks Committee's recommenda- tions pertaining to Case No. 77-22 which must be resolved prior to consideration of Case No. 77-23. Case No. 77-28. Standard Station - Expansion of ParklnQ Area Mil Ber explained that the additional 20' X 60' parking Is proposed so that the Indiscriminate boulevard parking can be eliminated; boulevard Is to be landscaped. -5-