Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CRICB'1'ON asked the engineer if the plan for the <br />improvement envisioned changing the sanitary sewer for those <br />homes that currently have the small lift station, Mr. Christof- <br />fersen said that it did, because the proposed sewer is of such. <br />elevation that those property owners could get into the sewer by <br />gravity if they desired to. He pointed out, however, that this <br />would not be a requirement, <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN WOODBURN said those loU had already been assessed <br />for sanitary sewer. <br /> <br />REVEREND A. D. HARf~~, 1280 West Highway 96: Said that <br />he's been at several Council meetings and Planning COllIIDission <br />meetings and they've heard different numbers for lots and houses <br />to be constructed. He had heard 109, then 116, and now 160. Be <br />asked where the additional land has been obtained and where the <br />additional houses are going. Mr. Popovich replied that the last <br />number was arrived at by assuming 14,000 square feet per lot, <br />taking all of the area within the improvement and dividing by <br />14,000. Obviously some lots would be larger and some smaller, <br />but that was the assumption made for purposes of the hearing, <br /> <br />Reverend Bartmark then said that because of the location of <br />their residence they would get no benefit from curb or from street. <br />He pointed out that they have their own street and asked how that <br />would affect the assessment. Xu:. Popovich said that the laCk of <br />benefits has to be taken into consideration at the assessment <br />hearing, but for purposes of the feasibility hearing the assump- <br />tion was made that each lot would receive all of the improvements. <br /> <br />14R. GALE K. NORDLING, Attorney at Law, representing Pilgrim <br />House and Reverend Bartmark: Asked if there was a time limit <br />within which property owners were required to connect to new <br />sewer and water systems. The answer was 2 years for sewer and <br />no requirement to connect to the water. <br /> <br />MR. ROBERT MANUEL, 4408 North Bamline (Spoke before): Asked <br />if the property owners on Amble would be asseased if "Go street <br />were put in. Mr. Christoffersen explained that there is a <br />division of the property betWeen Amble and oG" Street and people <br />owning property on "G" Street could be different owners from <br />the property owners on Amble Road. ~1r. Christoffersen also <br />repeated that the reason he placed the road in this location was <br />simply because there was room to put a street through there, and <br />if it's not desirable to have it there they could cul-de-sac and <br />leave a portion of it out. Mr. Christoffersen also suggested <br />that when the property is subdivided, there might be a better <br />idea for the location of a street. <br /> <br />MR, GERALD SLADEK, 4420 North Hamline (Spoke before): <br />Talking about "G" Street, he said that one of the reasons for a <br />