Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MfnUTGS of Regu!ar Council Mee'~ing <br />Pags four <br /> <br />January 10, 1977 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Judd Zands-rj-~:l20..<3.2ho~9.:')d_.QJ:ive, 58id i"hai" his neighborhood <br />seems to be surroundod by P-I (Presbyterian Homes, Lake Johanna Elem- <br />entary School and North\'!flstern College); doesn't feel the P-I is <br />very well defined; not many restrictions are placed on this P-I <br />zone. He said Lake Johanna School wi II be closed this year; suggested <br />that zoning should remain R-I as presently zoned, instead of P-l. <br /> <br />Jos~h Kahni,e, ',~')4i Edg3water Avenue, sE,id It is easy to see Public <br />Use of high sCheol, but asked if books Bra examined to determine <br />that Northwestern College is indeed a public use? Definition needs <br />clarification. Kahnke referred to applause given for Erickson's <br />statement; asked how malY are taxpayers? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Jim Guest, said tho new P-l classification concerns and bothers all <br />of us - no longer .ill have the R-I density restrictions; only P-I <br />restrictions. Fredlund said the P-I stil' must consider the area <br />around it; same Special Use Permit requirements as before - a new <br />P-I \1ill have -to go -j-hrough re-zoning as well. Gusst said it Isn't <br />very ciear what con-trols wi II be required. <br /> <br />Gene Vor.R.ahl, IS..2!.J?lenhi! I Road - P-I classification has wide use, <br />yet it is ambiguous and vague; fsel it vias done especially to accomo- <br />date Northwestern College. <br /> <br />Fredlund said it is used widely; not fer a special interest group. <br /> <br />~1rs. Peterson, L?36 Edg'a~Jater Av~- <br />Is Planner so adamant? The Planner's <br />oniy statements "in 'favor" of the P-I <br /> <br />With so many objections, why <br />job is to furnish Information; <br />are from Northwestern Col lege. <br /> <br />Betty Stanton, 1,569 _Edg3t.ai:..~_.Av0nue, asked '.'Ihat theadvantag05 of <br />the P-I are1 <br /> <br />Fredlund explained that it separates uses so they can be treated <br />differently and provides a zoning criteria for this separation - <br />sBpa~ates these uses from the R-I and R-2 in which they are presently <br />located. <br /> <br />Name inaudible - Why not a P-I Dis.rr!ct of vacant land? All ?-I does <br />is label exis.riqj schools s'J.c. as P-I. <br /> <br />L"IH1~ier l..i pDe'=..!..t__1517 Glenh j ! I ~_, sa i d no one wants NorthwBstel-n <br />Col lege to leave; the new ordinance is permissive, not restrictive. <br />A public college Is not allowed in our R-I District. Former ordinance <br />was one on whiCh residents could rely. P-i zone encourages rezoning. <br />Collage came in In 1970; was not permitted when exis~lng ordinance <br />was adopted; it's not up to tiHJ Counci I -;-0 get NOI-thlllBstern College <br />out of a bind. P-I District was proposed after Spec!BI Use Permit <br />for Northwestern ~ol !egB wes deniad. Private colleges do not belong <br />In 11-1 by ae.tion of the Counci I. Counci i is elected by the peopla; <br />we have the right to rely on our Caunci I to do what w. want. Lippert <br />said he wi I I send a statemont for the record. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Tom Erickson said he agrees with City Attorney Lynden that private <br />coTIoges-a;:e allowed In R-.! (permitted by Special Use Permit In R-J <br />Dis"rr'!ci"). <br /> <br />Karell A~bart3 4090 Valentine Crest Road - Mr. Faricy was here for <br />coTUtiibTa Traii5T:;:-:- whaf-a1-oiit traff i c g-ener"ted :)y buses and the <br />addition of 17 nBW lots? What wili happen if Columbia Transit is <br />zoned I-I? It's not shown on the proposed map. <br /> <br />Aftal- detarmining that -i'ilsre were no further' questions or comments, <br />Acting Mayor Crichton Cl050d the Public Hearing at i~:50 p.m. <br /> <br />Payroli <br />Wingert moved, <br />as pl'asented. <br /> <br />seconded by Hanson, that the Council approve the Payroll <br />'~otion cnrried unanimouslv. <br /> <br />-4- <br />