Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — MAY 12, 2025 10 <br />Sheriff to be effective, they need Flock in the areas where they will get the best reach. Having <br />listened to Mounds View and North Oaks about the impact the Flock cameras have had, he would <br />love to see that benefit for Arden Hills residents. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said over 5 years it will go from $8,000 to $17,000. We're doubling <br />the cost over 5 years. She would want to see the data flows, who has access and she would also <br />recommend that it is written into that contract that if there is a merger, acquisition or bankruptcy <br />that they get prior approval to have that data. She will need to see that information before making <br />any decisions. She asked if this data is being combined with other data. <br />Commander Hankee said if they get a hit and it helps them solve a crime. The investigator will <br />put that data into the police report. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked if that information is under Statute 13 or 169. <br />Commander Hankee said if it's a criminal matter it will be 169. The informaion will be in the <br />investigative report for those deputies. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked if someone could do a data request. This is public data but now <br />they're a vendor through other government entities. <br />Commander Hankee said if there is a request made, and it's deemed to be information they can <br />have, we are required to provide that information. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked if a Safe At Home participant can opt out. <br />Commander Hankee said someone in the Safe At Home program, would be protected and that <br />information would not be released. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said that may need to be looked at closer. If 30-days worth of data is <br />released, you could follow someone from White Bear Lake. She just needs a little more <br />information. <br />Councilmember Monson thinks this is a good conversation. We want to give our law <br />enforcement the tools they need. Protecting the data is important. She would like see what North <br />Oaks did. They probably went to levels that we would like to see. She would like to see where the <br />other cameras are. She asked if they are charging the contract cities inappropriately if it really is a <br />full county program. She would like to see that clarity. She asked who decides what gets picked <br />up, what gets kept, what gets used. Do they just pick the serious ones? Or are the alerts only for <br />serious issues? <br />Commander Hankee said it is set up so the deputies select what they get hits on. So he could <br />request major alerts. That could be a stolen vehicle, stolen license plates, they are wanted for a <br />domestic crime. He doesn't get the revoked drivers license and he chooses not to receive them <br />because his phone would be going off all the time. He assumes the deputies working the later <br />hours are selecting a lot more catagories than the officers in the day time. At night, they might <br />pick up a revoked driver and see what's going on. The information gets entered into the system <br />from the BCA and NCIC through the FBI. If a domestic issue occurs, they would tell dispatch to <br />enter it into the NCIC. Flock is fed into that. <br />