Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Sue Polka <br />June 2, 2017 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The total projected calculated storage need for the future North Pressure Zone, including the <br />proposed TCAAP development, is approximately 1.5 MG. Adding 1.0 MG of additional storage <br />capacity is needed to meet this requirement. The existing storage capacity of the North pressure <br />zone is significantly less (approximately 500,000 gallons) than recommended even without the <br />demands from TCAAP development included. In fact, the existing storage capacity is not even <br />sufficient to supply the Year 2017 average day demand of the North pressure zone. After the <br />proposed west side booster station is constructed, the firm supply pumping capacity to the North <br />pressure zone will increase to 4,500 gallons per minute (one pump out of service) and the <br />storage deficit will be decreased to approximately 30,000 gallons in 2019 and increase to <br />approximately 1.0 MG with full development of the TCAAP site. <br /> <br />- Water Pressures: The modeling results for maximum day static pressures on the distribution <br />system are depicted with pressure contours in Figure 2. The future system pressures for the <br />maximum day demand range from 48 psi at the high elevations to approximately 104 psi in the <br />low-lying areas. In Ten State Standards, it is recommended that the normal working pressure in <br />the distribution system be approximately 60 to 80 psi, and not less than 35 psi in any location. <br />During emergency conditions, such as high fire demands, pressure should remain above 20 psi. <br /> <br />The current and future system pressures are within the margins of industry standard at most <br />locations. The highest pressures in the system occur at the lowest lying areas near Rice Creek in <br />the TCAAP site and Round Lake, at approximately 100 psi. While this pressure exceeds the <br />maximum recommended pressure, creating a separate pressure zones in these small areas <br />would require separate individual pressure zones to be created with pressure reducing valves to <br />reduce the pressures to below 80 psi as recommended by Ten States Standards and the <br />Minnesota Plumbing Code. Therefore, individual pressure reducing valves on individual buildings <br />may be preferred by the City. <br /> <br />- Available Instantaneous Fire Flow: According to the American Water Works Association <br />(AWWA), the minimum fire flow available at any given point in a system should not be less than <br />500 gpm at a residential pressure of 20 psi. For commercial and industrial buildings, the needed <br />fire flow varies considerably, and are based on several characteristics of individual buildings as <br />previously mentioned above. <br /> <br />The computed available fire flows for the current distribution system are represented in Figure 3. <br />They are shown as fire flow contours in gpm, and represent the available fire flows at a residual <br />pressure of 20 psi during a maximum day demand. The required fire flows in a residential area <br />are usually less than1,500 gpm and in a commercial or industrial areas are 3,500 gpm or higher. <br /> <br />The available fire flows throughout the north pressure zone appear to meet the minimum <br />recommended flows for the TCAAP site. It can be seen in Figure 3 that the TCAAP site can be <br />connected to the existing north pressure zone from the south (across Highway 96 at the Spine <br />Road) and from the west (across U.S. Highway 10) with a 12-inch diameter main. <br /> <br />- System Improvements: Additionally, an extended period simulation (EPS) was conducted using <br />the updated model to analyze system operations during maximum day demands. The primary <br />purpose of this simulation was to check for cumulative system imbalances between the existing <br />North Tower and the proposed TCAAP tower in the north pressure zone since these imbalances <br />are not observed with a steady state model. <br /> <br />A 24-hour period was simulated with maximum day conditions to view the interaction between the <br />existing North Tower and the proposed TCAAP tower. Following the simulation, it was concluded <br />that to maintain balanced water levels within the existing North tower and the proposed TCAAP <br />tower an altitude valve will be required at the North tower. This valve will prevent the North water <br />tower from overfilling and allow the proposed TCAAP water tower to be filled to its full capacity. <br /> <br /> <br />