Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br />Rice Creek Commons Water Distribution System Modeling Results Update <br />January, 2025 <br />Page 6 <br />H:\KIMLEYHO_PR\0T4133552000\2_Preliminary\C_Reports\Preliminary Design Report Update\Report Update\Water Preliminary Engineering Analysis\Memo-Rice Creek Commons Water <br />Distrib Sys Modeling Results Update Final Draft 01.24.2025.docx <br />the required infrastructure to serve the area and develop a phasing plan time reference to construct the <br />required infrastructure. <br />The updated model has three watermains supplying flow to the TCAAP/RCC site, two crossing County <br />Road 96 W on the southeast side of the development area, and the other crossing Hwy 10 on the west <br />side of the development area, see Figures 1 & 2 in Appendix A. The model assumes looping of all trunk <br />watermain; therefore, Outlot A “the Thumb” on the north side has two watermains supplying that area, <br />both running parallel in the Thumb Rd roundabout, then diverging to the east and west sides of <br />Outlot A. Similarly, the 122-unit residential area on the northeast end of the development area was <br />given two watermains to allow looping. Looping is recommended to provide redundant supply routes in <br />the event that one breaks, and looping provides higher fire flow capacities. <br />Previous reports concerning the development of the TCAAP/RCC site suggest that a new water tower <br />and booster station be constructed to supply the north pressure zone with the addition of the <br />TCAAP/RCC development site. The previous studies assumed the development site would have higher <br />demand than the latest land use planning does and recommended the construction of a 1.0 MG water <br />tower. <br />This analysis allows for some background growth within Arden Hills, the current TCAAP RCC <br />development plan as shown in Appendix B, and some intensification of development beyond this <br />development plan. With these assumptions, we are recommending that a 0.75 MGD tower be <br />constructed within the TCAAP site. The original report recommended 1.0 MGD tower. The reduction in <br />size is primarily due to the reduced intensity/water supply need of development within the TCAAP site <br />when compared to the maximum AUAR development plan from 2015. As previously stated, the 0.75 <br />MGD allows for some background growth in other parts of Arden Hills and additional development <br />within TCAAP if proposed and approved. <br />Multiple scenarios were examined to determine what infrastructure is needed to provide fire protection <br />to the north zone and particularly the TCAAP/RCC development site. Scenarios examined 1) the existing <br />system to establish a baseline of water tower cycling rates (the rate water levels fall and rise based on <br />demand and pumping rates.) 2) the TCAAP/RCC site without a new tower or new west booster station, <br />3) the TCAAP/RCC site with a new west booster station, but not a new tower, and 4) the TCAAP/RCC site <br />with both a new water tower and new booster station. A scenario with a new tower but not a new <br />booster station was not considered because a new west booster station is considered an essential, <br />redundant supply route for the north pressure zone if the existing east booster station is down or <br />experiences a watermain break that would prevent it from functioning. <br />Extended period simulations lasting for a 5-day period were conducted for each scenario. During some <br />scenarios, a 3-hour, 3,500 gpm fire is simulated on the northeastern end of the Thumb, as this location is <br />furthest from the proposed tower site and is a commercial area that would necessitate higher fire flow <br />capacities. The 3-hour, 3,500 gpd fire flow is standard for the types of land uses proposed and is used in <br />the latest model studies provided by the City. <br />Additional controls were added to the model to allow the second booster pump of the existing east <br />booster station to turn on if the water level in the north tower continues to fall while the primary <br />booster pump is running. <br />To evaluate the system’s ability to provide water under several different conditions, the extended <br />period simulation (EPS) function of WaterCad was used. This type of allows the modeling of tank level