My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-27-25-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
05-27-25-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2025 6:32:45 PM
Creation date
6/20/2025 6:26:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br />Rice Creek Commons Water Distribution System Modeling Results Update <br />January, 2025 <br />Page 10 <br />H:\KIMLEYHO_PR\0T4133552000\2_Preliminary\C_Reports\Preliminary Design Report Update\Report Update\Water Preliminary Engineering Analysis\Memo-Rice Creek Commons Water <br />Distrib Sys Modeling Results Update Final Draft 01.24.2025.docx <br />To help define minimum system pressures, a 5,000 gpm demand was imposed at the north end of the <br />TCAAP development and was modeled for a duration of 3 hours to simulate a fire. Pressure contours <br />were generated to display the system’s pressures immediately following the 3 hour fire and are shown <br />on Figure 2. <br />The fire flow EPS simulation was also used to verify the appropriate pipe sizing for the new <br />development. Original plans included the installation of a 16” and two 12” diameter pipes connections <br />to the existing system to service TCAAP. During the simulation, it was determined that downsizing the <br />16” to a 12” would result in adequate flows and allow a 3-hour, 5,000 gpm fire flow while maintaining <br />a minimum residual pressure of about 40 psi. Results of the available fire flow throughout the system <br />are shown in Figure 3. <br />Additional Analyses <br />No additional analyses were completed with this engineering study update. <br />An additional analysis was performed to estimate the level of fire protection that could be provided <br />for a situation in which a single 12” pipe is initially installed to service the Outlot A area of the <br />development for a short period of time before the full expansion is constructed. The results of this <br />analysis indicate that this pipe, connecting to the Arden Hills system near Prior Avenue and Highway <br />10 at the north end of Arden Hills, would produce a 3-hour, 2,200 gpm fire flow. Also, additional fire <br />flow could be obtained with an emergency connection to Mound View (a normally-closed gate valve <br />“interconnection” between the Arden Hills and Mounds View systems that would only be opened in <br />the event of a water emergency). Information provided by Mounds View was analyzed, and it is <br />expected that by opening this emergency connection, a target fire flow of 5,000 gpm will be <br />attainable throughout most of the Outlot A area. Only the very northernmost portion of Outlot A may <br />be slightly reduced, providing fire flows in the 4,000 to 5,000 gpmrange. <br />Another analysis was performed to determine the full-development system’s service ability in the <br />event that one of the supply lines into TCAAP would be out of service. The results of this analysis <br />indicate that additional pumping could overcome the loss of flow through the out of service <br />transmission pipe; hence, it does not appear that an emergency connection to Mounds View or AHATS <br />is required. However, for Mounds View, if there is an early development in the Outlot A area, the <br />interconnection will be beneficial both in terms of improved fire flow and also simply to provide an <br />alternate water supply in the event water service via the single 12” pipe from the south is <br />inadvertently interrupted. <br />These results also indicate that adequate water supply would still be available if the 12” connection on <br />the southeast side of TCAAP were omitted. However, without knowing the sequencing of the planned <br />construction, and given the possibility that one of the other connecting pipelines could be out of <br />service, it would be beneficial to construct the southeast 12” pipe (going south from the water tower) <br />in order to loop the water tower location. This is particularly true given that complete construction of <br />the 12” pipe going north from the water tower is not likely until some of the later phases of TCAAP <br />redevelopment have been completed, making the completely-connected pipe unavailable for some <br />time.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.