Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MAY 27, 2025 11 <br /> <br />Undersheriff Ramacher said decisions made with the contract cities are collective decisions. <br />They are mutually beneficial decisions for all of the cities involved. He can’t think of a scenario <br />where a city has come in after the fact and wanted to retract their position on a certain thing. If <br />that were to happen, City Administrator Jagoe would be the conduit to talk to the other cities <br />regarding what that looks like. They’ll consider anything. It’s typically not how decisions are <br />made. They want to do things that are mutually beneficial for all the parties involved. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson said how we contract will be important. She wondered how the <br />contract cities will be notified if Flock expands it’s capabilities, via AI, maybe they can see the <br />color of the car, they can read the speed, facial recognition. <br /> <br />Undersheriff Ramacher said that notice would come through the City Administrator. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson said at that point there should be a significant reconsideration. AI is <br />going to get good at this. If we have data that can identify a series of things and the system gets <br />hacked. Then what? <br /> <br />Undersheriff Ramacher said he sat through an AI presentation. He agrees, it’s coming. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson said she has two major concerns. First, the contracting with the <br />opportunity to decide if we want to continue after changes take place. Secondly, she is concerned <br />that this is the first step to increased costs in policing. RCSO does a great job. She appreciates that <br />we have low crime. That is attributable to them. This Council is very responsible when it comes <br />to the budget. Between RCSO and the fire department, public safety is about 50% of the budget. <br />She said the federal government hasn’t passed data privacy laws and a lot of states don’t have <br />them. She wondered where the buck stops. Who is responsible for protecting the data? That’s the <br />City Council and the County Commissioners. The agencies who are lower are usually the ones <br />trying to protect people’s date. She feels like this is a victim of a bigger issue. She feels like her <br />questions are all solvable, she just would like to hear those answers before proceeding. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden said she thinks the contract with Flock should state it reads license <br />plates only. Then they would have to come to us to amend the contract if other capabilities <br />become available. <br /> <br />Undersheriff Ramacher agrees. He knows the AI is already out there. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson said she thinks companies are always looking for a way to expand their <br />business. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant said he would like to sort through all these questions. This small item, out of a <br />$1.75 million per year contract is increasing the effectiveness and safety for RCSO. He’s okay <br />with the cameras. He would like to give each Councilmember a chance to state if they are okay <br />with Flock or not. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson said she just summarized her concerns. She wants to understand the <br />data and contract pieces before saying yes. If we’re totally liable for breached data, it will swing <br />which way she goes. <br />