My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 11-30-1981
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
CC 11-30-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:01 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 4:09:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN JOHNSON: Let's assume that eventually we could <br />do something with that bridge over 694. Is it your intention <br />. then to widen it sufficiently enough to provide five lanes, <br />plus pedestrian? <br /> <br />MR. LEONARD: That's correct. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN JOHNSON: So if you ever do something with it, <br />it will ultimately match the rest of the profile on Lexington? <br /> <br />MR. LEONARD: That's the proposal at this point, yes. <br />In fact, it will be 72 feet instead of 68 (inaudible). <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: County Road E is apparently not going to <br />have its bridge changed. We've asked for it before, and it's <br />not (inaudible) enough to have a priority, not even a low <br />priority. Anything further fro~ the Council? <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN McALLISTER: I've asked you before - eventually, <br />where the plans (inaudible) north on Lexington - you're taking <br />it up to the driveway at Control Data. Then what? <br /> <br />MR. LEONARD: Our original proposal here, a few years back, <br />was to improve it all the way to Trunk Highway 96. First of <br />all, this improvement, the width of this improvement, was <br />anticipated to narrow down as soon as we got on top of the hill <br />there by the next entrance to Control Data, .to a 52 foot road- <br />. way, more nearly similar to Lexington Avenue to the south. <br />Because the gas tax receipts have held rather constant on a <br />cents-per-gallon income and construction costs have gone up <br />considerably, we have cut this project back this far. We do <br />not presently have scheduled when we will be able to fund the <br />next piece on up to 96. But it's still in our program, it's <br />something we would like to do, but the money just isn't there. <br />(Inaudible) maybe this will bring in some additional funds. <br />Construction costs have gone up faster than the receipts, and <br />we just cut the project down. Someday maybe. This isn't for- <br />gotten. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: What are your traffic projections on <br />Lexington? Do you think they'll change with this? If so, <br />where would they subtract from, if anyplace? <br /> <br />MR. LEONARD: We don't anticipate that this project will <br />be subtracting any numbers of traffic, with the exception <br />. probably of Victoria, where people may be getting off Victoria <br />and going around and corning through "F" from that direction. <br />There may be some influence seen (inaudible). We anticipate <br />increased traffic here, but what's happening is Control Data <br />and Deluxe Check and Land O'Lakes - as the development in the <br />area that is being served here at 694 and off of "E" - that <br />is building up the traffic increase. We don't anticipate a <br />. gr7at deal of tra~fic corning off of other. roads that are <br />be1ng used (1naud1ble). We see the need 1S there now. The <br />road is overloaded. There .is every indication that additional <br /> <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.