My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 11-30-1981
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
CC 11-30-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:01 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 4:09:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> MRS. ZEHM: No, I have not received any. <br /> . MAYOR WOODBURN: I will open the public hearing. The <br /> developer is here if you would to make any comments. <br /> MR. CURT LAUGHINGHOUSE, Derrick Land Company: We did <br /> petition for the improvements within Arden Oaks and we do hope <br /> they will be improved and put upon the program for next summer <br /> and be financed as a public improvement, as we have requested. <br /> One thing I was surprised at, and it's not a great deal, but <br /> I was surprised at the size of the section and I guess I need <br /> to ask Mr. Christoffersen - the size of the road section - is <br /> that 34 feet back to back or inside the faces? <br /> MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN : Face to face. <br /> MR. LAUGHINGHOUSE: So it's even greater, 35 feet perhaps, <br /> back to back. When I say back to back, I mean back of curb to <br /> back of curb. <br /> MR. CHRISTOFFERS EN: Back of curb - it would be closer to <br /> 35, 35 1/2. <br /> MR. LAUGHINGHOUSE: That's just a bigger section than <br /> what I'm accustomed to, but if that's the City standard, that's <br /> just fine. Mr. Popovich did refer to the terms of assessment. <br /> That is, whether its 15 years or three or five or otherwise. <br /> . We would prefer longer assessments - it makes it much more <br /> reasonable for - of course, this will be settled next fall. <br /> As you can imagine, these lots will not necessarily sellout <br /> immediately, and the better terms that can be available, the <br /> easier it will be on the ultimate consumer of the lots. Other- <br /> wise, I'd be glad to answer any questions. <br /> MR. POPOVICH: On that point, he indicated he could wait <br /> with the development agreement until the assessment hearing. <br /> From our point of view, 'assuming we sell bondS in a month or <br /> two, if you're going to have a development agreement, we <br /> should know that now, because in the bond prospectus that goes <br /> out we could then indicate that there would be some $466,000.00 <br /> of $648,000.00 that would be paid over a three to five year <br /> period because of the terms of the development agreement. <br /> That affects whether we go with long term financing or short <br /> term financing because obviously, if the people who are going <br /> . to bid on the bonds know that so much of it is going to be <br /> paid within a certain period of time - that's going to affect <br /> your interest rates. So we can't wait until the. assessment <br /> hearing next fall. That's something that the Council and the <br /> attorney and the developer should get together on before we <br /> advertise for bond bids. I just wanted to say that so Curt <br /> would know where I come from right now, not next year. <br /> . MR. LAUGHINGHOUSE: I didn't realize that. We'd be happy <br /> to work that out. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.