My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 11-30-1981
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
CC 11-30-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:01 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 4:09:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> so that an architectural control committee within our company <br /> controls the architecture, or the design, of the house. As to <br /> . the dollars question, I doubt very much that anything on there <br /> could be built for less than $100,000, or probably $140,000 or <br /> $150,000 or $160,000. We sincerely hope that it will be in <br /> that range, or more, because the lots are going to have to be <br /> priced at $25,000 and up. One doesn't build $100,000 homes - <br /> that's probably the minimum that you can build on a $25,000 <br /> lot. I don't anticipate devaluating the properties around it <br /> at all. I don't mean to sound elitist - I think we're going to <br /> do a good job of controlling the architecture. However, we will <br /> not - I strongly doubt that we'll be building the homes. That <br /> is not our custom. <br /> MAYOR WOODBURN: Another question I can perhaps answer <br /> here - this is a residential zone and this type of zone, 95 <br /> feet is the minimum lot that would be allowed - 14,000, plus <br /> or minus, square feet. <br /> MR. STOUTENBURG, Isn't that quite a bit more from what <br /> our standard lots are there? <br /> MAYOR WOODBURN: Perhaps more than what yours is, but not <br /> in an R-l zone -it's 85 feet, I believe, in R-2; 95 feet, I <br /> believe, in R-l. Your lots were designed a while before the <br /> zoning was in, I'm sure. I would like to just vaguely comment <br /> on something else you said - I think the general experience is, <br /> . when new, expensive houses are built in a neighborhood like <br /> this, that it helps the housing value. <br /> MR. STOUTENBURG, It helps their housing value. <br /> MAYOR WOODBURN: No, yours. I think that is what is <br /> generally found. I'm not a realtor - somebody else might want <br /> to comment on that too. <br /> MR. LAUGHINGHOUSE, I did remember another question the <br /> gentleman asked - the lots on the east side are extra large. <br /> The reason is that the land along the east side is quite low. <br /> It's sort of an extension of that pond that's up on the north- <br /> east corner. That is the reason that they are larger lots. <br /> It's not possible to move the road to the east and put more <br /> lots in. We have put the lots in, more or less to the stand- <br /> ards of the City - minimum standards of the City. Again, what <br /> . the Mayor said, 95 foot frontage and so many square feet. <br /> MR. STOUTENBURG, When you go through a project like <br /> this, do you level off all the trees or are you going to leave <br /> most of the oak trees that are in that area back there and <br /> let the homeowner that buys the lot determine how many trees <br /> he wants to cut down? <br /> . MR. LAUGHINGHOUSE, Same answer. A modern developer is <br /> not like the developer in the 1950's. We all learn, I guess. <br /> Not that I was a developer in the 1950's, but we don't clear <br /> 6 <br /> ----- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.