My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-27-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
05-27-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2025 2:21:04 PM
Creation date
6/24/2025 2:20:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — MAY 27, 2025 4 <br />9. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS <br />A. Motion to Approve Development Agreement — 1700 Highway 96 W — Trident <br />Development — Planning Case 24-018 <br />Senior Planner Fransen stated on January 13, 2025, the City Council approved a Master and <br />Final Panned Unit Development, Final Plat, Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit and <br />Easement Vacation for Trident Development ("Developer") at 1700 Highway 96 W. The project <br />was approved with 33 conditions. The project would subdivide the property into two conforming <br />lots, to facilitate construction of a 162,819 square foot, 119-unit multiple family dwelling on an <br />approximately 41.10-acre property, and construct additional parking for the existing house of <br />worship. <br />Senior Planner Fransen reported on April 28, 2025, the City Council reviewed a request to <br />modify language in the Conditions of Approval in Resolution 2025-007 based on the Planning <br />Case approval. The nature of the request was to modify Condition 28, which established that the <br />Developer would be responsible for the cost and installation of 1,373 linear feet of trail along <br />Snelling Avenue and within Snelling Avenue right-of-way, adjacent to the Subject Property, to <br />serve as a connection to Royal Hills. The Developer proposed to make a financial contribution <br />toward the cost of the trail in place of bearing the total expense of the 1,373-foot trail as <br />referenced in Condition 28. The Developer also requested updated language to Condition 29, <br />which references a 396-foot trail segment associated with the Development. The City Council <br />tabled this item for review at the next Council meeting. At the May 12, 2025, City Council <br />meeting, the Council approved Resolution 2025-040 and proposed language to modify Resolution <br />2025-007. The City Council approved amending Condition 28 to read: <br />28. The Applicant shall contribute $200,000 to the cost of installing a trail along Snelling <br />Avenue and within Snelling Avenue right-of-way to serve as a connection to Royal Hills <br />Park. The City shall complete the construction of the trail. Trail costs in excess of <br />$200,000 will be paid by the City using funds from the Applicant's park development fee. <br />Senior Planner Fransen reported the City Council also struck Condition 29 of Resolution 2025- <br />007. This project requires a Development Agreement between the City and the Developer before <br />the development permits can be issued. The City Attorney has prepared the Agreement reflective <br />of both resolutions and the document has been reviewed and approved by the Applicant and staff. <br />Mayor Grant reported the development agreement was drafted by the City Attorney. He asked if <br />the City Attorney had any comments regarding the development agreement. <br />City Attorney Bjerkness stated the development agreement before the Council was the product <br />of many months of work with the developer. She noted she was available for questions or <br />comments from the Council. <br />Councilmember Weber reviewed Condition 10 on Page 29 within the development agreement <br />and stated he did not believe the City should be dictating turning movements onto a County road. <br />He stated the Planning Commission recommended the turning motion language be struck entirely <br />and that the County be allowed to determine how County roads are accessed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.