CC 02-09-1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of Regular Council Meeting February 9, 1981 " After discussion, Johnson moved, seconded by Hollenhorst, that, in the case of the current application (Case No. 81-4), the Special Use Permit fee of $100.00 plus consultant costs be con- sidered acceptable. In further discussion, it was noted that a lot split requires separate legal action; Special Use Permits would cover variances, but,because lot splits require a separate legal document, they should be charged separately. It was suggested that, if more than one request can be contained in one legal document, one fee could be charged. . It was noted that Resolution 80-64 adopts separate fees; therefore, motion is out of order, unless Resolution is changed. Council action was deferred to the next Council meeting. Approval of Spring Park & Recreation Programs Council was referred to Spring Parks and Recreation Department Program Activity Proposal - Spring 1981. McAllister noted that the Parks Committee will consider the pro- posal on Tuesday, February 10th. Hollenhorst moved, seconded by McAllister, that Council accept the Spring Program subject to approval of the Parks and Recreation Committee. Mot.ion carried unanimously. (If program changes are made by the Parks and Recreatiob Committee, McNiesh was requested to poll the Council.) Park Ordinance No. 214 Council was referred to McNiesh's memo of 2/9/81 re City regulation of County parks. Crichton suggested that the Council proceed to apply the ordinance to City psrks; may also apply to County parks, if so determined. Buckley's memo of 2-6-S1 was reviewed relative to Park's Committee recommendations of 11-lS-S0, 12-11-S0 and 1-13-S1. . Johnson and Ho11enhorst reported concerns of Parks and Recreation Committee, relayed to them by Chairman Adele Anderson. Of partic- ular concern is the proposed change in Section 4.11 to allow beer drinking in the parks; committee strongly recommended previously to prohibit all alcohol in the parks, unless authorized by the Parks Director. Hollenhorst stated that she personally feels the proposed ordinance, based on the Ramsey County ordinance, is too sophisticated for the city parks; suggested that the Parks Committee be requested to make fresh recommendations, not based on the Ramsey Co. ordinance. It was noted that the ordinance proposed is the result of the Parks and Public Safety Committees' recommendations over several months of deliberation; was subsequently prepared by the Attorney as proposed. . McAllister said she is opposed to alcohol in the parks; would like Council's intent on this issue. Hollenhorst said she would prefer that the present Parks and Recreation Committee develop recommen- dations for this Council. After further discussion, Woodburn moved that Council refer Ordi- nance No. 214 to the Attorney to be re-drafted in the spirit of the Council's modifications and discussions, for Council'a con- sideration. Motion was seconded by Johnson. In further discussion, the ordinance as previously amended was reviewed in its entirety, and the following changes were made: -5-