My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-27-25 WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
05-27-25 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2025 3:46:05 PM
Creation date
6/26/2025 3:45:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — MAY 27, 2025 18 <br />Councilmember Holden said she wants the Columbus pole and she thinks Council should also <br />pick the top. She likes the traditional. <br />Councilmember Monson agrees. She likes the traditional over the lantern. <br />Mayor Grant thinks they should have the acrylic lens. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said the options for the street light the <br />option is dark brown or black. <br />Council agreed on black. <br />Mayor Grant said the design manual could change. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said the last question to clarify for the street <br />light is pre -pay or standard service. In this case he thinks standard service would make sense. <br />C. Proposed Booster Station (TCAAP) <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen presented the information for the proposed <br />booster station. This would be constructing an additional booster station at the south tower. He <br />provided an attachment with the full study of the water distribution modeling results. The <br />recommendation is to have the new booster station be constructed at the same time as the spine <br />road. It's important to get ahead of that design. We have to make sure this station is integrated <br />with the existing system. Staff recommendation is to proceed into design and have bidable plans <br />ready to be flexible with the timing of the spine road. Within the study it states that this booster <br />station can be used for the City today, as a redundant system. The booster station we have now <br />feeds our north tower, which creates that northern pressure zone. If anything were to happen to <br />that 16" trunk main, from the booster station, we'd be working against time to fix the issue before <br />the north tower drains. This booster station would allow for a redundant system in case there were <br />any issues with that 16" trunk main. It would be a redundant system for right now but it is needed <br />for TCAAP. <br />Councilmember Holden doesn't want to get this confused with regular and TCAAP. TCAAP <br />needs to pay for this. She asked what the engineering costs will be. She asked if $250,000 is right. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said he knows it's slightly less than that, but <br />he added some contingency in there, not knowing if there will be further design needed with the <br />SCADA. <br />Councilmember Holden said we don't have SCADA. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said we have SCADA that talks to the <br />booster and the towers today. We will need to make sure it integrates with this system. <br />Councilmember Holden asked where the money is coming from. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.