My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-27-25 WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
05-27-25 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2025 3:46:05 PM
Creation date
6/26/2025 3:45:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — MAY 27, 2025 7 <br />implication that by not supporting Flock cameras that we some how don't support the safety of <br />our residents. Having it as a line item in the budget is a lot different than it being added to <br />Ramsey County contract for cities and the Ramsey County policing, overall budget. <br />Undersheriff Ramacher said it will be absorbed into that after it's approved. This request is <br />coming mid -budget cycle. It doesn't have to be a separate line item. It will be in addition to the <br />$1.75 million. <br />City Administrator Jagoe said the term of the RCSO contract goes to December 31, 2029. She <br />said the term of the Flock lease agreement for the cameras is still under discussion if it will be a 3 <br />or a 5 year term. If there is a concern in regard to the duration of the lease agreement, maybe <br />RCSO could look at some way to align it so the lease agreement terms out with the contract. <br />Councilmember Weber asked if a contract city ceases to contract with RCSO, what are the costs <br />to decommission the camera? Would the County absorb them into their own system? <br />Commander Hankee said that Flock is a leased system. They have the hardware. <br />Undersheriff Ramacher said when the hardware is updated, it's done at their cost. They <br />continually upgrade the hardware. <br />Councilmember Weber asked if there is a removal fee for the cameras. <br />Undersheriff Ramacher doesn't think so, but he will check with the vendor. <br />Councilmember Holden had an incident in her neighborhood that involved seven different <br />policing agencies. She thinks the Flock system could have prevented that. In reference to the <br />comment that it's not our camera and not our data, she pointed out that RCSO is not our Staff <br />either. We contract with RCSO. We don't have say over the training or any other operational <br />procedure. We contract with Metro-INET and they have access to our emails. We trust the people <br />we contract with. The only information Flock uses is the license plate number of known criminal <br />activity that had been previously entered into the system. <br />Undersheriff Ramacher confirmed. The rest of the captures are 100% benign. <br />Councilmember Monson said that is different from what Commander Hankee said the last <br />time. <br />Commander Hankee said it is capturing the data but it isn't being fed back to RCSO. <br />Councilmember Monson sought clarification. She said, if you don't put in a license, RCSO will <br />still get pinged for the domestic violence warrant that drove by. <br />Commander Hankee said if a vehicle that is in the hot file with BCA drives past a camera, it will <br />ping RCSO. <br />Councilmember Monson said that is not the same as searching for a license plate and having the <br />system dial in to search for it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.