My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 07-28-1980
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
CC 07-28-1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:04 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 4:10:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />13 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />that a change in the design of the road could reduce the limit <br />and we do come with recommendations from our commit me for your <br />consideration. <br /> <br />You have received a memorandum from the Committee but the <br />Committee recommends to the Council that you approve the County <br />Road E downtown concepts in your Packet No. 3/4 and 4/4 which <br />have been referred to as interim design. We feel very strongly <br />that the ultimate design - while it may work - would, in fact, <br />be detrimental to the businesses in Arden Hills, and we feel <br />these businesses must be retained. <br /> <br />Our second recommendation is that the elements of lighting, <br />underground utilities, walkways, traffic channelization and <br />landscaping in our report of December 21, 1979 should be approved <br />in total and if any single element would be considered to be <br />left out of that package, we recommend no action be taken at <br />this time. <br /> <br />Our third recommendation to the Council is that the City <br />participate to a minimum degree of 50% in the cost of this <br />improvement. It's our only downtown area in Arden Hills <br />and we feel this responsibility of the city to participate <br />to some extent. . <br /> <br />These are the recommendations we present <br />you and everyone who has been a part of this. <br />recommendations will be accepted and acted on <br />Thank you. <br /> <br />to you <br />We do <br />by the <br /> <br />and we thank <br />hope the <br />City. <br /> <br />MAYOR CREPEAU: Anyone else? <br /> <br />DIANE MC ALLISTER, 1200 Ingerson Road: What did Northern <br />States Power say it would cost? <br /> <br />MAYOR CREPEAU: $358,000. <br /> <br />MRS. MC ALLISTER: Did I understand you - if my taxes go <br />up $300 over the next 10 or 15 years and I feel this improvement <br />doesn't improve my house $300 worth, I can take them to Court? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: Any aggrieved taxpayer who is assessed has a <br />right to appeal. Those that are assessed have the right to <br />challenge. When it's spread over the City there is no way. <br />That's Council discretion. <br /> <br />MAYOR CREPEAU: That's general taxes. Anyone else a comment <br />or question of any type? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.