My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-02-2025 JDA Agenda Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Joint Development Authority (JDA)
>
JDA Agenda Packets
>
2025
>
06-02-2025 JDA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2025 4:55:03 PM
Creation date
7/3/2025 4:54:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 7, 2025 <br />Outlot A Lessons Learned <br /> <br />The following is a list of lessons learned that Ryan Companies experienced on the Micro Control <br />Company pursuit which has the potential to impact future development at RCC. (These lessons were <br />viewed through the lens of industrial/advanced technology/manufacturing asset type. We did not <br />evaluate the potential challenges if we had been proposing office, retail, etc.): <br /> <br />1. TCAAP Redevelopment Code <br />a. Industrial development is not explicitly contemplated within the TRC <br />i. This creates challenges as mixed use and multi-family code overarches into <br />industrial which is not always applicable <br />b. Maximum allowable adjustment to the TRC requirements can only deviate up to 10% <br />c. Table 5-2 definition of Industrial Uses requiring 30% office <br />i. We understand and appreciate that the likely rationale for this is to deter pure <br />distribution users. However, lab/assembly/production/manufacturing spaces <br />are often times full HVAC with important jobs. <br />ii. We would like the JDA to consider redefining this 30% office requirement to <br />include space that is fully HVAC’d and occupied by employees vs. pure non- <br />HVAC’d or sparsely occupied storage/warehouse spaces. <br /> <br />2. Maximum building height <br />a. Code contradicts itself = states 15 stories building height maximum, but 24’ clear <br />maximum if there is a loading dock <br />i. Any 15 story building would require a loading dock <br />ii. Code currently notes clear height definition as two different things: <br />1. Top of finished floor to bottom of the finished ceiling <br />2. Finished floor to bottom of the structural members of the ceiling <br />iii. Consider modification to state 32’ clear from top of finished floor to bottom of <br />structural steel member for simplicity and flexibility with potential tenant pool <br />1. For reference: 28’-32’ clear height for industrial/advanced tech is <br />market standard <br />a. Industry standard for clear height measurement location: the <br />second bay into the building following the speed bay at the <br />loading dock wall. <br /> <br />3. Shading requirements <br />a. Shading from buildings and other project components are not viewed as methods to <br />meet shading requirements. <br />b. The ability to demonstrate compliance by means of a shade study should be considered <br /> <br />4. Parking ratios <br />a. Much higher standards than a typical user would require <br />b. Contradicts what this development is trying to achieve from a “green” perspective <br />c. Proof of parking is not allowed in the TRC but is allowed in the AHC
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.