CC 12-09-1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of the Arden Hills Re1JUlar Council MeetiLg, 12/09/91 Page 2 . CALENDAR (Cont'd) g. RecornInerKlation from Parks camnittee. on Purchase of Property . h. Approval of 1992 Business Licenses. i. Payroll AccountiLg O1ange for Hourly Enlployees. j. Approve Salary Increase f= City Administrator. K. Approve List of Claims and Payroll. Motion carriErl unanimously. (3-0) PUBLIC ro1MENI'S cliff Aichinger, representing st. Paul Turner's, statai he wishErl to express concerns regardin3" renewal of the Charitable GambliLg Premise Permit for this organization. Council concurrErl that it would be preferable to discuss the premise pennit renewal in conjunction with Item 6 (B), Ordinance No. 284, amending the Charitable GambliLg Chapter. No further comments from the floor. CASE #91-05; Council was referrErl to the mem:>randum from the Deputy FINAL PlAT, Clerk datai 12-6-91, and attachErl materials relatiLg to HANSON'S IAKE case #91-05, Final Plat of the Hanson Addition. Council1nember Malone noted the setback from Lexington Avenue on Lot 1, Block 1, has been adjusted at the request of Ramsey County. He questioned if the diagonal . rear lot line, proposed as a revision in the Planner's report, provides an average lot depth that is in compliance with the lot depth requirements. Malone also questionErl if the proposed revision in the lot line is acceptable to the applicant. Engineer Graham advised the proposErl diagonal lot line maintains the requirErl square footage and lot depth. Warren Hanson agreed that the proposal, listai as option #3 in the Planner's report datai 12-6-91, is acceptable. Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to approve case #91-05, Final Plat of Hanson's lake Josephine Addition, Lexington Avenue and Shoreline Lane, with the incorporation of the adjustai rear lot line between lDts 1 & 2, Block 1, outlined as Option #3 in the Planner's report and requiriLg no variances f= the adjustai line, coOOitioned upon the Engineer's review of the plat to insure the lot is shown on the final plat as approved. Motion carriErl unanimously. (3-0) Warren Hanson referrErl to the 20-ft. roadway easement, mentioned in the Engineer's report, and explained the easement is not a part of the property involvErl in the final plat. Hanson also referrErl to the 10 foot drainage and utility easement shown on the south portion of the platte:i property, from Lexington Avenue to lake JosefHline. He advised the easement is retained f= drainage/utility purposes. Hanson noted . the Engineer explained a five foot easement on each side of the property line is nomally maintainErl.