Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 8-12-91 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />CASE #91-12 (Cont'd) Bergly stated the park was b.lllt on fill placed in a <br />former wetland and lI1Um of the site has wet soil <br />conditions, whim tend to rapidly deteriorate wood siding. He noted several of <br />the existing wood sided units in the park are obviously in need of residing. <br /> <br />The Planner stated he contacted three managers of large mobile hOllleS parks in the <br />metro area and found that all three of the parks allow both wood and vinyl <br />siding; none allow metal siding. Bergly reviewed other factors relating to wood <br />and vinyl siding he discussed with the three mobile hOllle park managers, as listed <br />in his report of 8-7-91. <br /> <br />Bergly advised that the last aJ\\E!OOment to the SOP in 1977 contained a condition <br />that "screen" fencing be installed around the st=age area and the approved plan <br />showed the fence as a 5 foot wood fence, with 5'x 8' cedar panels. He noted the <br />existing fence arOl.U1d the storage area in a 5 foot chain link fence, which offers <br />little s=eening f= the lots ab.J.tting the rather cluttered storage area. <br /> <br />The Planner explained the owner of the park attended the Public Hearing and <br />advised he had initially installed a wood fence, whim deteriorated in a short <br />period of time. The owner explained a chain link fence was then installed. <br /> <br />Bergly reccmnended Council include a condition f= installation of a 5 foot cedar <br />fence and gate arOl.U1d the st=age area, as outlined in his report of 8-7-91, if <br />approval is granted. He reviewed. the other conditions reccmnended for inclusion <br />with action for approval of the request. <br /> <br />Planner Bergly stated the Planning Commission recc:amnen:1ed approval of the amended <br />Special Use Permit to allow vinyl siding, rot not metal siding and conditioned <br />upon the four conditions listed in the Planner's report, page 3, 8-7-91, based on <br />the rationale listed in the Planner's report. He recc:amnen:1ed an additional <br />condition be attached to direct the city Attorney to draft the SOP amendment. <br /> <br />Councilmember Mahowald questioned if the request is based upon cost of wood <br />siding versus vinyl siding. He also questioned if the condition to maintain <br />earthtone colors should include stronger language to stress its inportance. <br /> <br />The Planner stated there is a slight savings in cost by utilizing vinyl siding; <br />unsure if cost is the basis f= this request. Bergly advised the Conunission <br />discussed the provision to maintain earthtone col=s f= SOIIletime; concurred that <br />IOClSt mobile hame park managers appear to review this matter and maintain the <br />requirements and such latitude should be at the discretion of the management of <br />the park. <br /> <br />Councilmember Growe noted the Planning Commission discussion indicated problems <br />are =ing in the storage area whim warrant the use of a chain link fence to <br />provide visual surveillance of this area. She questioned what type of problems <br />are experienced in this area. <br /> <br />Bergly stated the discussion did not clarify what was happening behind the cedar <br />fence. He advised the park owner indicated authorization was given to install the <br />chain link fence; no dOClllOOl1tation of the auth=ization was subni.tted. Bergly <br />explained the plan subni.tted in 1977, as part of the amended SUP approval, showed <br />a 5 foot cedar fence. <br />