Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-J ' ~ ,. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 7-8-91 <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />BRING (Cont'd) Malone !roVed, secoooed by MahcMald, to adopt Resolution <br />No. 91-45, ADOPI'ING FINAL ASSESSMENT ROIL IN '!HE MATl'ER <br />OF '!HE 1991 NORI'H SNELLING AVENUE IMPROVEMENl'S, as amended to reflect a front <br />foot assessment rate f= residential properties at $22.00 per front foot, and <br />tax-exenpt: properties at $44.00 per front foot, and that those properties located <br />on the corners of Royal Hills Road and its intersection with North Snelling, be <br />assessed f= front footage in the manner outlined in the assessment policy, and <br />further amended under Section 1. to include language which indicates the final <br />assessment roll as amended at the meeting this date and to be attached to the <br />resolution. Motion carried unanilnously. (3-0) <br /> <br />Malone lIIOVed, seconded by Mahowald, to adopt Resolution <br />No. 91-46, Al.u:o;r>.L'.u/G BID AND AUIHORIZING EXECUI'ION OF CXlNI'RACI' IN '!HE MATl'ER OF <br />'!HE 1991 NORI'H SNELLING AVENUE IMPROVEMENr, to Midwest Asphalt, as the lowest <br />responsible bidder. <br /> <br />'Ihere was ColUlCil and staff discussion relative to delay of the bid award to the <br />contractor pending formal aweal from property owners. Engineer Maurer and <br />Attorney Filla agreed the delay would not inpact construction, and the ability to <br />delay the bid award has been incorporated into the doa.nnent. Attorney Filla <br />explained the process and time span for residents to sul:rnit a formal appeal. <br /> <br />Councilmembers concurred that the adopted assessment roll reflects benefit <br />derived by property owners and preferred to proceed with the bid award at this <br />time . <br /> <br />. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) <br /> <br />1991 RECYCLING Council was referred to a memorandum from the Clerk <br />AGREEMENT Administrator dated 7-1-91, relative to the proposed 1991 <br />Recycling Agreement fram E-Z Recycling f= a three year <br />contract and incorporates a provision f= beginning plastics recycling in 1991. <br /> <br />Administrator Berger advised he corrlucted a survey with refuse haulers, relative <br />to the $85.00 cost per ton for recycling, and found the figure to be reasonable. <br />He further noted that in checking with other canmunities, it appears a three year <br />agreement is reasonable at the $85.00 rate. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone questioned the amount of tonnage recycled on a monthly <br />basis. <br /> <br />Chris Reinhardt, E-Z Recycling, advised the figure is approxilllately 50 tons per <br />month. <br /> <br />'Ihere was discussion regarding the possibility that furxling from Ramsey County <br />would not be available in 1992 and billing individual households on a quarterly <br />basis. <br /> <br />Mahowald lIIOVed, seconded by Malone, to awrove the <br />three-year recycling agreement from E-Z Recycling, as presented, and authorize <br />execution of the doa.nnent by the proper City officials. Motion carried <br />unanllnously. (3-0) <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone suggested E-Z Recycling rearrange the text in the brochure <br />proposed f= distrib..Ltion to residents, relative to the plastics recycling <br />program. <br />