Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meetin;J, 5-28-91 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />IMPROVEMENT (Cant' d) <br /> <br />Engineer Graham advised both streets are in poor <br />condition and are rated for the overlay project. <br /> <br />Mayor Sather favored the overlay of the street and supported future consideration <br />to reduce assessment costs for construction related to closure of the street by <br />the amount assessed to individual parcels for the bituminous overlay project. <br /> <br />Councilrnember Malone favored inclusion of the street in the overlay project, <br />based on previous Council discussion relatin;J to the street closure. He noted <br />that the "Tee" turnarourrl design preferred by the Engineers would result in a <br />loss of approxiInately 50 feet of the bituminous surface. <br /> <br />Bob Kunze, 4073 Valentine Court, discussed the placement of a barrier on <br />Valentine Avenue, near the entrance to Valentine Crest Road, which would allow <br />ingress/egress for residents and prohibit thru traffic on Valentine Avenue. <br /> <br />Malone m:>ved, seconded by Sather, to authorize the <br />Engineer to proceed with the bituminous overlay of Valentine Avenue. Motion <br />carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />AOOPI' RFS. #91-34; <br />FINAL ASSESSMENT <br />mLL, VALENI'INE AVE. <br />1991 PVMT. MAINT. <br /> <br />Malone moved, seconded by Sather, to approve Resolution <br />No. 91-34, AOOPrING FINAL ASSESSMENT mLL FOR VALENI'INE <br />AVENUE IMPROVEMENI'S (1991 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE l'ROJEX'::I') . <br />Motion carried unanllnously. (5-0) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Council recessed at 8:45 p.m. and reconvened at 9:00 p.m. <br /> <br />PRESENI'ATION ; <br />1990 CITY AUDIT <br /> <br />Council was referred to the 1990 Audit document and the <br />Management letter, as prepared by Abdo, Abdo and Eick. <br /> <br />Auditor Gary Groen was present to review the dOCln1lel1t and answer any questions. <br />Groen offered suggestions for operational changes, as outlined in the <br />administrative letter suhnitted with the audit, and advised he has discussed the <br />changes with the Clerk l\dministrator and A=untant. He suggested Council <br />consider a review of utility rates to determine if the charges are sufficient to <br />maintain the fund balance. <br /> <br />Councilrnembers thanked Groen for his presentation. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Council was referred to the final report dated 5-22-91, <br />from the city Hall study Ccanmittee, recommending the <br />constJ:uction of a new City Hall and Public Works <br />facility. <br /> <br />Ccanmittee Chair Dennis Probst was present to discuss the work of the canmittee <br />and the final reconunendation. He advised the COIlII1littee identified four general <br />site areas from the thirteen candidate sites prO)XlSed by the Planner, although no <br />recarmnendation is made at this time for a specific site or whether both city Hall <br />and the Public Works facility should be on the same site. Probst stated the <br />canmittee further recommends Council consider retaining a consultant to finalize <br />the tuildinJ programming effort, to canplete site analyses of the four candidate <br />sites and to determine the desirability of locatin;J the Public Works Facility on <br />the same site. He also indicated the proposed square footages in the report <br />should be reviewed. to determine if the estiInates are adequate. Probst noted <br />durin;J tours of other community facilities, the cormnittee fourrl the square <br />footage estiInates listed in the report to be comparable, based on staffin;J and <br />population. <br /> <br />REXXMlENDATION ; <br />CITY HALL SIUDY <br />~ <br />