Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 4-8-91 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />BID (Cont'd) Buckley explained $14,000.00 was Wdgeted and most of the <br />monies are reiInWrsed by property owners f= removal of <br />trees from private property. <br /> <br />Councilmernber Malone asked which company was awarded the =ntract in 1990. He <br />noted Arp's was utilized in 1984 and 1985; questioned if the company suJ::mitted <br />bids in subsequent years. <br /> <br />Buckley stated outside Tree Service was awarded the bid in 1990 and Arp's did <br />suJ::mit bids from 1986 thru 1990, however, they were not the low bidder. <br /> <br />Mahowald moved, seconded by Hansen, to award the 1991 <br />Di="'~ Tree Contract to Arp's Tree Service of Anoka, as the lowest responsible <br />bidder, for removal of trees at the rate per tree irrlicated in bid received. <br />Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> <br />OROS. 277 & 278; <br />LEXINGTON/FOX <br />AREA REZONING <br /> <br />Council was refen-ed to a meIOClranchnn fram the Clerk <br />Administrator dated 4-5-91, relative to the proposed <br />rezoning of the Lexington/Fox Business Area and <br />related correspondence from the Planner and Attorney. <br /> <br />The Planner stated one month ago the Planning Commission recommended to Council <br />adoption of the rezoning of the lexington/Fox Business Area and two properties <br />were excluded fram the re=rnmendation for further review; the Pugleasa property <br />and the Tyson property. He explained staff has met with the property owners to <br />review these two sites and both properties were discussed at the 4-3-91 Planning <br />meeting . <br /> <br />Planner Bergly advised the Planning Commission recommended the Pugleasa property <br />be rezoned from 1-2 to B-2 and a variance be granted with the rezoning of this <br />site, to allow the percentage of acx::essory use to be 45.3% instead of 30% as <br />required by code. He explained the rationale for granting the variance is based <br />on the fact the City, rather than the property owner, initiated the rezoning. <br /> <br />Bergly stated there are some seasonal variations in the amount of area of the <br />Pugleasa property that is used f= an accessory use; st=age of inventory varies <br />depending on the t:i1ne of year. He explained that 45.3% would be the greatest <br />amount of space utilized for storage at any t:i1ne in the wilding. <br /> <br />Malone questioned if 45 percent would be sufficient or if the percentage should <br />be 45.3%. He also questioned if the storage area is inside the wilding. <br /> <br />Bergly advised it is difficult to calculate the exact figure and 45 percent would <br />be sufficient. He stated the storage area is totally inside the facility. <br /> <br />Malone asked if this is the only property south of the railroad tracks proposed <br />f= rezoning. <br /> <br />Bergly stated there is another parcel to be rezoned in this area, however, the <br />Pugleasa property owner was the only one to appeal the rezoning. He noted that <br />there is also another parcel proposed to be rezoned in the I-Flex district, <br />however, Tyson was the only property owner that opposed the rezoning. <br />