Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, .. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 3-11-91 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />RES. 91-16 (Cont'd) <br /> <br />Council questione:i the arrangement of the basketball <br />court at CUmmings Park and suggested it be changed to <br />allCM full-court play, rather than half-court play. <br /> <br />The Park Director explained it aj:pearS the use of the court with the current <br />arrangement allows two separate groups to participate in the activity at the same <br />time; agreed it could be easily chan;Jed to acx:ornmodate full-court play. Buckley <br />advised that neighborhood meetings were held to discuss the illlprovements. <br /> <br />Hansen moved, seconded by Mahowald, to adopt Resolution <br />No. 91-16, ORDERING PRELIMINARY FEllSIBILITY REroRr FOR 1991 PARK IMPROVEMENI'S. <br />Motion carried unanim::lusly. (5-0) <br /> <br /><XlNCEPI' RPI'; <br />COUNTY RD. I <br />ALIGNMENT <br /> <br />Council was referred to a report fram the Clerk <br />Administrator dated 3-7-91, relative to the Draft <br />County Road I Concept Report fram Ramsey County. <br /> <br />Berger reviewed the meeting held with staff, Ramsey County representatives, <br />Shoreview city staff and Arn1y officials to discuss the proposed inprovement <br />project and aligrunent alternatives. <br /> <br />Engineer Maurer explained that this is a "concept" report, not a feasibility <br />study and the matter will have to return to Council in the form of a feasibility <br />study, with costs outlined. He advised that this matter was before Council in <br />1988 and Alternative #1 was chosen as the Council preference. Maurer briefly <br />outlined the four alternatives, noting that Alternative #4 is recommended by the <br />City of Shoreview and the County, and is the only straight aligmnent of the <br />roadway proposed. <br /> <br />The Engineer explained that strictly from an engineering standpoint, Alternative <br />#4 is the best choice for aligrunent. He advised the problem with Alternative #4 <br />is that it will open a number of fiscal concerns for Arden Hills, due to the <br />County funding policy; it is the most costly alternative for the City of Arden <br />Hills. He advised the feasibility study should outline several senarios for cost <br />participation and funding methods. He noted the City has the responsibility for <br />aoquisition of 2.6 acres of land in conjunction with aligrunent alternative #4; <br />the other alternatives do not require land aoquisition. <br /> <br />Engineer Maurer reviewed the discussions with the City Engineer fram Shoreview <br />and referred to camments in a memorandum fram Chuck Ahl, dated 3-7-91, which <br />advises Shoreview staff has expressed a willingness to cooperate on cost <br />discussions. <br /> <br />Council questioned if the Arn1y officials indicated a willingness to donate the <br />land necessary to a=rplish aligrunent alternative #4, and if the City is also <br />responsible for other items such as moving the fence, aa::ess road, well and <br />wetland issues. <br /> <br />Ramsey County Engineer Kathy Roettger advised the Arn1y has expressed a <br />willingness to provide the city of Arden Hills with a long-tenn lease for the <br />land required for easement, at no cost to the city. Tim Mayasich, Ramsey County <br />Planner, advised the County asStmtes the responsibility for all other items <br />outlined in =njrmction with the realigrunent of the roadway. <br /> <br />cormcil discussed the use of funds set aside for this project, which were <br />obtained when the Arn1y Training facility requested utility service fram the two <br />cities and =ncurred that Arden Hills cost participation should not exceed the <br />amount received for this purpose. <br />