Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> Arden Hills Council 9 October 13, 1992 <br /> Mark Osojnicki, an owner of Mr. Movies, asked if the length <br /> of t.he variance could extend as long as Mr. Movies occupied <br /> the space. Attorney Filla explained t.hat if a nonconforming <br /> use is allowed, typically the intent is that it be a <br /> temporary situation with a limited duration. Mayor Sather <br /> advised :.hat in the past., other nonconforming sign <br /> situations have been made t.o comply or requests for <br /> variances have been denied because there has not been <br /> justification for allowing them to remain even temporarily. <br /> MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Mahowald, to approve the <br /> request. for a sign variance, relative to 1160 West <br /> County Road E, wit.h the conditions that: <br /> , The variance will terminate when Mr. Movies' <br /> ~. <br /> existing ten-year 1 ease expires, or when Mr. <br /> Movies vacates the property, or when any tenant <br /> changes occur within the entire building at. 1160 <br /> West County Road E, whichever occurs first. <br /> ~ Prior to termination of the variance, a signage <br /> ~. <br /> plan for the entire building is to be submitted to <br /> t.he City for reconsideration. <br />. 3. The use of the existing pylon sign in front of <br /> 1160 west County Road E is to be limited to <br /> exclusive use by TCF bank until the variance <br /> terminates and a new signage plan is considered. <br /> Based upon the rationale that: <br /> l. The leasing arrangement. between the owner and t.he <br /> tenants relied upon signage allowed by the City in <br /> the past. <br /> ~ Allowing the sign nonconformity for a limited time <br /> ~ . <br /> will recognize Mr. Movies' invest.ment in existing <br /> signage. <br /> 2. This compromise will lessen the nonconforming <br /> signage situation at 1160 West County Road E. <br /> Motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> EEOUEST TQ PURCHASE CITY PROPERTY <br /> Administrator Person reported the Cit.y has learned of a <br /> developer's interest in purchasing a parcel of City-owned <br /> land, which has been used in the past as a lift. station but <br /> is now abandoned. she explained that some of the issues <br /> which need to be discussed are the costs involved in <br /> removing the 1 i ft station, and determination of a current. <br /> property value, park land fees, development fees, etc. She <br /> asked for direction f:-om Council as to whether they are <br />. interested in selling the property, and if so, who is to <br /> negotiate the matter with the interested buyer. <br /> Attorney Filla noted that this type of sale is not subject <br /> to the usual public contracting laws and does not require <br /> submittal of sealed bids. He suggested investigating how <br />