Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />August 31, 1992 <br /> <br />roofline of the proposed building requiring a variance to <br />75' height." Council agreed to this l'evision. <br /> <br />Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to approve the minutes <br />of August 17, 1992 Regular Council Meeting with the <br />above-noted revision to page seven. Motion carried <br />unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />MOTION~ <br /> <br />CONSENT CALE!iPll.R <br /> <br />Councilmember Mahowald and Growe agreed to approve item "a" <br />under Consent Calendar, but expressed interest in further <br />di::"cussing the item under "Council Comments". <br /> <br />Hicks moved, seconded by Malone to approve the Consent <br />Calendar and authorize execution of all necessary <br />documents contained therein. Motion carried <br />unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br /> a. <br />. b. <br /> c. <br /> d. <br /> e. <br /> <br />PUBL I C_~911.MENTS <br /> <br />Accept resignation from Jerry Miller, Chair, <br />Public Safety/Works Committee. <br />Appointment of Additional Election Judge for the <br />1992 State Primary Election. <br />Approval Final Pay Estimate #5 for 1991 North <br />Snelling Avenue Improvements. <br />Approve Release of Collateral Held on City's <br />Behalf from Norwest Bank. <br />Approve List of Claims/Payroll, <br /> <br />There were no public comments. <br /> <br />PUBI.IC Hj;;ARINGS <br />KEITHSON POND ASSESSMENTS <br />(continued from July 20 & June 29, 1992) <br /> <br />Mayor Sather opened the meeting at 7:40 p.m. for the purpose <br />of continuing a public hearing (from July 20 and June 29, <br />1992) on Keithson Pond Assessments. Acting Clerk <br />Administrator lago verified remailing of notices to affected <br />property owners on July 30, 1992. <br /> <br />Reviewing background, City Engineer Graham recalled that <br />estimated assessments for the proposed Keithson Pond project <br />were presented at the June 29 and July 20 assessment <br />hearings, where affected residents were given the <br />opportunity to register their objections. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Graham added that on July 20, Council: <br />1) Based on the opinion of the City appraiser, established <br />a maximum supportable per lot assessment of $1,500; and <br />2) Based on the opinion of the City Engineer after review <br />of the topography of the area, determined which <br />