CC 08-31-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Arden Hills counci.l Q August 31: 1992 is bargaining with Mr. Reiling. Filla stated that so far there lias b0en no negotiation with Mr. Reiling to make a trade of assessment for property or any similar agreeme~ts. Filla stated that it is the City's hope that the layout of the pond will benefit the Reiling property to a degree that Mr. Reiling may cooperate and the City can reduce its exposure to compensate Reiling for intrusion on his property. Filla added that if the Reiling property were to be assessed, assessment hea~ings would need to be .l:>:::~con.ducted . Filla referred to Dick Foster's cbject:Lon i.n the Summary and Response document that if the Reiling property had been developed at the same time as the Keithson development, the cos t of thi s impr'ovemen t woul d be less. Fi 11 a commented that this may be true, but Mr. Reiling did not wish to develop his property at that time. . Dick Foster cornmented that if t.he Ci ty had tak.en action a few years ago by digging the existing pond deeper, problems ~ciuld have been corrected then. Fi,lJa reiterated that Mr Reiling has [leVer ~gl~~ed to grant an easement to allow the City to do so; if he had, the City would have taken action earlier. Filla added, however, that assessments would hav~ be0n sl.1pportable in t~at scenario. !:LiJ~L-,Q.Qj",ctio:: _~~.A5.2.lLJ\eithson: Regarding Hills objection o~ the premise that this project benefits the entire community, Filla stated he ag,-eed and that is Hhy the City at large will be absorbing such a large share of the costs. He added that certain prope,-ties, those proposed to be specially assessed, receive additional berlefit. Giel Obiection - 4534 Keithson: Teresa Giel stated her comments have al ready been answered this e1lening r but she was offended by some Council comments earlier this evening. II a wy.S"~r 0 bie c t i oD-'----=__~~V)~}2___E,~:t",th_:?_QJ1_~ objection bas al2~eady been co,rered pj,llB stated this tri,is evening. . stenn",o?. Obj_",ct,ior, - 4S40 Kei ths_on:. Fil] a refen'ed to stennes' objection that the majority of the Stennes p~operty does not d~ain j,nto the pond and therefore does not receive be~efit. Filla explained that Council determined tha~ 25% of the stennes property drains to Keithson Pendt therefore the owner would be assessed 25% of the maximum supportable per lot assessment. Attor::ey Fillarecornmended that the July 27/ 1992 Summary and Response document and the videotape record::a9 of this evening's l~eeting be preserved for at least 90 days. The public hearing was closed at 9:47 p.m.