Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />August 17, 1992 <br /> <br />MOT ION : <br /> <br />Hicks moved, seconded by Malone, to adopt Resolution <br />No. 92-57 Adopting Final Assessment Roll In The Matter <br />Of The 1992 Dunlap Street Cold In-Place Recycling <br />Improvements. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Hicks moved, seconded by Malone, to adopt Resolution <br />No. 92-58 Authorizing Execution Of contract In The <br />Matter Of The 1992 Dunlap Street Cold In-Place <br />Recycling Improvement. Motion carried unanimously <br />(4-0) , <br /> <br />ROUND LAKE ROAD_~EST - 1992 .~QLD IN-PLACE_ <br />RECYCLING PROJECT ASSESSMENT HEARING <br />RESOLUTION 92-60 ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL <br />RESOLUTION 92-59 AUTHORIZING CONTRACT <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Sather opened the meeting at 7:43 p,m. for the purpose <br />of conducting a public hearing on assessments for the 1992 <br />Cold In-place Recycling Improvement to Round Lake Road West. <br />Acting Clerk Administrator Iago verified publication of the <br />notice of hearing in the New Brighton Bulletin on Wednesday <br />July 29, and mailing to affected property owners on <br />Thursday, July 30, 1992. <br /> <br />Engineer Westerberg stated: On June 8, 1992, a public <br />hearing was held on the Round Lake Road West Improvement <br />project, at which an estimate of $14 - $15 frontage foot <br />assessment was projected. Upon Council direction, plans and <br />specifications were prepared for the project, and bids were <br />received. The lowest bid received was approximately 30% <br />below the engineers' estimate for construction of the <br />project. The proposed funding for this project is to be 50% <br />assessed to the property owners and 50% paid by the City, <br />with an assessment rate (established by Council on July 13, <br />1992) of $11.00 per frontage foot. <br /> <br />Acting Clerk Administrator Iago reported that correspondence <br />dated August 3, has been received from Scholl's Inc. The <br />correspondence neither opposes or favors the assessment, but <br />lists concerns relating to drainage issues; staff has <br />responded to the correspondence. There were no comments <br />from the audience. Public hearing was closed at 7:47 p.m, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone questioned the nature of the drainage <br />concerns expressed by Scholl's, Inc. Engineer Westerberg <br />stated that Scholl's initially had some concern regarding <br />drainage relative to their driveway, which was addressed by <br />repaving the driveway. He added that Scholl's present <br />concern involves drainage patterns to the north of the <br />driveway. He explained the measures planned to be taken to <br />address the situation, and stated that he does not <br />anticipate a problem, <br />