Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />August 17, 1992 <br /> <br />Council could add yet another condition whereby the SUP <br />would expire upon the sale of the property, <br /> <br />Mahowald moved, seconded by Malone, relative to Case <br />92-14, to waive the Development Moratorium, and approve <br />a special use permit for home beauty salon occupation <br />with the following conditions: <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br /> l. <br /> 2. <br /> 3 . <br /> 4. <br /> 5. <br /> 6. <br /> 7. <br />. 8. <br /> 9, <br /> <br />The applicant's State Cosmetology License will be <br />filed with the permit when available, <br />Only one work station will be provided, <br />Only the owner of the dwelling is authorized to <br />provide cosmetology services, <br />The driveway will be used for patron parking <br />(i.e.; no on-street patron parking), <br />There will be no external evidence of the home <br />occupation, <br />Exterior lighting will be of a "residential" type <br />and will not be obtrusive to neighboring property, <br />The business must close by 7:00 p.m., Monday- <br />Friday, and by 4:00 p.m. on Saturday, <br />The special use permit applies only to the current <br />homeowner and only at the residence at 3966 <br />Glenview Avenue, and <br />The special use permit will expire upon sale of <br />the property at 3966 Glenview Avenue, <br /> <br />The applicant, Cynthia Garretson, stated that hours of <br />operation, outlined within condition 7 of above motion, were <br />a compromise during discussions with the Planning <br />Commission, however, she preferred some flexibility of those <br />hours, She added that she has a limited time in which to <br />renew her State Cosmetology License, and is required to note <br />her anticipated hours of operation on that application. <br /> <br />Council discussed the issue of whether or not to regulate <br />hours of operation. Acting Clerk Administrator Iago <br />reported that there is one other SUP in the City for a <br />beauty salon; that SUP makes no regulation of salon hours, <br />that salon is still in operation, and there have been no <br />complaints received. <br /> <br />Sather moved, seconded by Hicks, <br />motion by striking condition 7. <br />carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ORIGINAL MOTION: <br /> <br />to amend the above <br />Motion to amend <br /> <br />Council then voted upon the original motion, <br />(made by Mahowald and seconded by Malone) as <br />stated except striking condition 7. Motion <br />carried unanimously (4-0). <br />