CC 07-27-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Arden Hills Council 3 July 27, 1992 directed to flow into the wetland instead of through the channel. she added that residents should not be assessed for any improvement because the City allowed development of the area even though the location is inappropriate for development, and she adamantly opposes assessment if the environmental issues are not addressed. Brad Lis, 1548 Arden Place, supported directing flow to the wetland rather than through the channel to avoid any detrimental affect on the environment. Dale Noyed, 3505 Ridgewood Road, stated that all he wants is to correct the problem of water in his backyard and basement and on his neighbor's (McGuire's) property. He added that either he or the contractor has to periodically pump the water from his property. He recommended the City use the most direct, shortest drainage route possible in order to control costs. He asked if there may be a company outside the City which may be more experienced and better equipped to try to unplug the existing pipe. . Arnold Lindberg, 3520 Siems Court, stated his property borders the lot affected by the drainage problem and he questioned whether every possible attempt has been made to unplug the existing drainage pipe. He stated that substantial clogging of the existing pipe occurred during development of he area. He recalled that when the lots were developed a certain area was identified for drainage purposes. Lindberg stated it appears the City did not follow through to insure the drainage area was maintained. It was his opinion the City would be obligated to correct the problem. Public Works Superintendent Winkel explained that several attempts to clear the existing pipe were unsuccessful and it was assumed, based on checks at several different points along the pipe, that it is plugged solid with tree roots and other debris. He voiced concern that further investigation to unplug the existing pipe may result in the loss of trees in the area. The public hearing was closed at 8:00 p.m. . Councilmember Mahowald asked if there is any possible method available to clear the existing pipe. Winkel stated that all attempts to unplug the pipe revealed it was plugged solid in all areas checked. Mahowald stated that the estimated costs of the two remaining drainage options are relatively similar, but perhaps one last attempt to clear the existing pipe may be prudent. Attorney Filla agreed that the cost of the two remaining options to redirect drainage are similar taking into consideration anticipated easement acquisition costs.