CC 07-13-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Arden Hills Council 5 July 13, 1992 Harry Schroeder, architect for Amoco, explained that currently the additional parking has been required since there is more demand for the service garage than can be handled. By adding a third service bay to the station, more service work can be performed in a quicker fashion, thus fewer cars will be parked. Councilmember Mahowald said theoretically that may be so, however, he preferred using the language suggested by Attorney Filla relative to condition 6. Councilmember Mahowald asked if the concerns expressed by the adjacent dental office have been addressed. Bergly said the dental office concerns related to trespass light from the car wash, and the new layout eliminates that potential problem. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to approve the amended SUP for Amoco oil Company, 1306 West County Road E, (Case 92-06) subject to: Ten conditions spelled out within the July 1, 1992 Planning Commission minutes, condition 6 to read: "That the parking agreement between the restaurant and Amoco be filed with the SUP as this parking is necessary to meet the parking requirements of the station. The parking agreement shall provide 20 additional spaces. In the event that lease terminates, the SUP shall be reviewed and the City may impose additional restrictions necessitated by loss of parking spaces, including, but not limited to, the reduction in the intensity of the use.", and, Proof of parking lease between Amoco and the adjacent restaurant and title for the property be provided to the City Attorney for his review and approval. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). . CASE 92-12 - MINOR SUBDIVISION - ALPO . City Planner Bergly outlined the existing 14.88 acre property at 4251 Fernwood Avenue North, which the owner is proposing to split into two nearly equal sized parcels, one for the Alpo Pet Food site and one vacant parcel. He added that there is a slight discrepancy in the lot descriptions which will need to be cleared, but Planning Commission's position was that the intent was obvious and acceptable and the attorneys could work out the lot description details, therefore, they recommended approval of the minor subdivision with six conditions.