My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02-10-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CC 02-10-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:11 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 4:32:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 2-10-92 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />TILLER (Cont'd) Engineer Terry Maurer explained the city recently <br />:i1I1plemented a Pavement Management Program, which rates <br />all streets in the City and, based on the rating, places the street into one of <br />three ca~ries for :i1I1provement,; sealcoat, overlay = reconstruction. He <br />advised the streets are reviewed every three years. <br /> <br />Maurer explained the program indicates Tiller Lane is rated in extremely poor <br />condition and warrants reconstruction. He stated the city has also adopted an <br />assessment policy which outlines the methcxi of assessing various types of street <br />and utility :i1I1provements. <br /> <br />Maurer stated the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility study of <br />the proposed Tiller Lane reconstruction :i1I1provement last year, and after review <br />of the feasibility study, authorization was given to prepare detailed plans and <br />specifications for the :i1I1provement. <br /> <br />The Engineer explained the proposed :i1I1provement of Tiller Lane from Lexington <br />Avenue to Hamline Avenue. He advised the sanitary sewer and watennain were <br />investigated and found to be in gocxi condition; no major utility :i1I1provements are <br />proposed. He noted some minor modifications to the storm drainage utilities are <br />necessary and are proposed with the reconstruction of the street. <br /> <br />Maurer advised the initial feasibility report has been mcxiified and reflects <br />additional costs for soil :i1I1provement. He explained the soil analysis for the <br />project indicates the material underneath the street is directly responsible for <br />the poor condition of the road; the soil contains organic material which holds <br />water and is susceptible to frost. He stated the revision to the report proposes <br />e=avation of approximately one and one-half feet of material from the road, <br />replace the soil with a granular material and install drain tile along the edges <br />of the roadway, to keep the material dry and in condition to support the inproved <br />road surface. <br /> <br />The Engineer reviewed the estimated costs for the :i1I1provement: <br /> <br />- street :i1I1provements <br />- Min= storm Sewer adjustments <br />- SUl:grade co=ections/drain tile <br /> <br />$179,500.00 <br />9,900.00 <br />65,900.00 <br /> <br />Total Estimated Project Cost <br /> <br />$337,000.00 <br /> <br />Engineer Maurer explained an additional 32 percent is included in the <br />construction cost to cover items such as, mailed notices, preparation of plans <br />and specifications, survey work and staking, and other miscellaneous items <br />charged to the project. <br /> <br />Maurer explained the assessment policy indicates that all residents will be <br />assessed a fair share of the costs for a standard residential street, whether or <br />not they reside on a County road, State Aid road or standard residential street. <br />He stated the "residential equivalent assessment rate" is defined as 50 percent <br />of the cost of a typical residential street :i1I1provement. Maurer noted the minor <br />storm sewer costs are assessed 100 percent to the benefitted property owners. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.