Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ Arden Hills Council 3 October 12, 1993 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />City Engineer Maurer explained that the most recent proposal <br />actually is the same as the original plan and calls for the <br />installation of a storm water inlet which originates at <br />approximately half the depth of the 1553 Arden place property <br />and a drainage system which runs southerly across the Arden <br />Place street and between properties at 1548 and 1540 Arden <br />place to eventually flow to Lake Johanna. He stated that <br />when this plan was originally presented, there was resistance <br />by the property owner at 1540 Arden place to provide the <br />necessary easement, but that matter has since been resolved. <br /> <br />Maurer reported that the low bid for this project was from F. <br />F. Jedlicki in the amount of $22,510, and overhead is <br />estimated at $5,627.50, for a total estimated project cost of <br />$28,137.50. He added that eight properties have been <br />identified as contributing storm water run-off to the existing <br />drainage problem. He noted that two options for payment of <br />the project are under consideration. <br /> <br />Maurer explained that Option 1 would consist of all eight <br />contributing property owners paying an equal share of the <br />. total cost of the project ($3,517.19 per property). He stated <br />that Option 2 would involve each of the eight contributing <br />properties paying an assessment relative to the amount of <br />their respective run-off contribution. He added that he has <br />determined that if Option 2 were used, 1553 Arden Place would <br />be 100% contributor, 3517 Ridgewood Court would be 25% <br />contributor, and the other six properties (3487,3505 and 3511 <br />Ridgewood Road and 3510, 3520 and 3530 Siems Court) would be <br />50% contributors. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks commented that the estimated overhead <br />figure of $5,627.50 ref 1 ects onl y overhead for the actual <br />project, but does not cover any of the engineering or legal <br />work that has been done in the past to try to resolve this <br />drainage problem. Administrator Person concurred, adding <br />that, to date, the City had already expended $7,354 in 1992 <br />and 1993 toward work involving the Arden Place drainage issue. <br /> <br />Councilmember Probst commented that the property at 1553 Arden <br />Place obviously would benefit the most from the drainage <br />improvement project. He asked what procedure would have to be <br />followed if that owner were to be levied a larger assessment <br />than $3,517.19. Administrator Person stated that the notices <br />for this public hearing stated that the maximum possible <br />assessment would be $3,517.19 per property; if any property <br />. owners were to be considered for an assessment higher than <br />that amount, a new publ i c hearing woul d be requi red wi th <br />appropriate notice of new potential maximum assessment <br />figures. <br />