My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 09-13-1993
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
CC 09-13-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:12 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 4:42:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />September 13, 1993 <br /> <br />Mayor Sather commented that all potentially assessable <br />property owners need to be notified of the potential <br />assessment. Sather suggested, and the Council concurred, that <br />the amount on notices should reflect 100% of the estimated <br />project cost. Sather commented that doing so would give the <br />Council room to negotiate. Administrator Person reminded that <br />the amount listed on notices may be reduced but not increased. <br /> <br />Warren McGuire, 1553 Arden Place, stated that although eight <br />homes were previously identified as contributing to the <br />drainage problem, six of those owners objected to being <br />assessed based upon the argument that their properties would <br />not benefit from a project. He added that it would be a waste <br />of time for the City to attempt to assess those six property <br />owners because, although they are supportive of correcting the <br />drainage problems, they have in the past clearly stated their <br />position that they would bring a suit against the City if <br />assessed, which could delay the improvement indefinitely. <br /> <br />Regarding the degree of benefit to particular properties, <br />McGuire questioned whether his property at 1553 Arden Place <br />would receive more benefit than property at 3505 Ridgewood. <br />He recalled that Dale Noyed of 3505 Ridgewood has filed <br />complaints with the City for several years regarding drainage <br />problems affecting 3505 Ridgewood. McGuire noted that in <br />high water events, about one-half of Noyed's yard floods while <br />only a small portion of MCGuire's property floods. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone said while he appreciates McGuire's <br />comments, the question of paying for this project still <br />remains unanswered because although the Council has the power <br />to decide the f ormul a, there is a questi on whether the <br />taxpayers of the entire City, through the storm water <br />management uti 1 i ty, should pay for a project which benefits <br />only a particular neighborhood. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Malone moved, seconded by Aplikowski, to adopt Resolution <br />93-44 Determining Assessed Cost of Improvement and <br />Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment Roll in the <br />Matter of Arden Place Drainage Improvement of 1993, and <br />Setting an Assessment Hearing at 8:00 p.m., October 12, <br />1993. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.