Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />July 12, 1993 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />In response to Councilmember Malone's inquiry, City Engineer <br />Maurer explained that Warren Hanson has proposed connection <br />to the existing sanitary sewer system to service the lots he <br />has created, which would not require disturbance of the <br />Andersen or Bachman properties. He added that water service <br />connections are available to the lots created by Hanson. <br /> <br />Councilmember Probst reiterated earlier Council comments <br />that Council is simply attempting to establish, on paper, an <br />amended Transportation plan which would not be applied until <br />the study area properties were sold, The Official Map would <br />simply indicate that the City is interested and willing to <br />obtain easements at the time the study area properties sell. <br />He assured that the City could acquire easements or proceed <br />with improvements only with the participation of the owners <br />of the properties within the study area. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stressed that the City takes seriously <br />its responsibility to plan logical street and utility <br />systems to assure systems can be maintained properly with a <br />reasonable degree of ease, and to protect the community from <br />potential hazards such as dangerous curves in streets or <br />poorly designed and potentially problematic sewer systems. <br /> <br />with regard to the confusion created by receipt of the <br />individual notices indicating a potential assessment of <br />$8,000, Councilmember Malone explained that the City mailed <br />the notices to alert the neighborhood of this evening's <br />meeting and future "potential" assessment. He noted that <br />when the City sends notices on a matter such as this, the <br />City is required by law to alert recipients of "potential" <br />assessment, even though, in this instance, the potential for <br />assessment is remote until perhaps the distant future. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone said it should be noted that alternate <br />subdivision configurations can be submitted by Andersen <br />and/or Bachman or their successors in the future, and the <br />official Map would not preclude the City entertaining those <br />alternate configurations, but would indicate the City's <br />preferred future road alignment. He emphasized that the <br />City is not considering or planning on proceeding with road <br />improvements in this area at this time. <br /> <br />Attorney Trooien countered that defining a "paper street" <br />connection of Shoreline Lane will affect the Bachman and <br />Andersen properties in that should the property owners <br />submit an alternate subdivision configuration, the City <br />could refuse it on the basis that it is inconsistent with <br />the Transportation portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br />